home.social

#bakker โ€” Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #bakker, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ-๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐˜‚๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ญ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฑ-๐—ž๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ

    Telstar raakt aanvoerder Danny Bakker kwijt aan de Zuid-Koreaanse club FC Anyang. De 31-jarige centrale verdediger stroomt halverwege het seizoen in, want in de hoogste divisie (K-League) zijn al zeventien wedstrijden gespeeld.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/56

    #Telstar #Bakker #ZuidKorea

  2. ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ-๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐˜‚๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ญ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฑ-๐—ž๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ

    Telstar raakt aanvoerder Danny Bakker kwijt aan de Zuid-Koreaanse club FC Anyang. De 31-jarige centrale verdediger stroomt halverwege het seizoen in, want in de hoogste divisie (K-League) zijn al zeventien wedstrijden gespeeld.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/56

    #Telstar #Bakker #ZuidKorea

  3. ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ-๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐˜‚๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ญ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฑ-๐—ž๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ

    Telstar raakt aanvoerder Danny Bakker kwijt aan de Zuid-Koreaanse club FC Anyang. De 31-jarige centrale verdediger stroomt halverwege het seizoen in, want in de hoogste divisie (K-League) zijn al zeventien wedstrijden gespeeld.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/56

    #Telstar #Bakker #ZuidKorea

  4. ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ-๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐˜‚๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ญ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฑ-๐—ž๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ

    Telstar raakt aanvoerder Danny Bakker kwijt aan de Zuid-Koreaanse club FC Anyang. De 31-jarige centrale verdediger stroomt halverwege het seizoen in, want in de hoogste divisie (K-League) zijn al zeventien wedstrijden gespeeld.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/56

    #Telstar #Bakker #ZuidKorea

  5. ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ-๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐˜‚๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ญ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฑ-๐—ž๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ

    Telstar raakt aanvoerder Danny Bakker kwijt aan de Zuid-Koreaanse club FC Anyang. De 31-jarige centrale verdediger stroomt halverwege het seizoen in, want in de hoogste divisie (K-League) zijn al zeventien wedstrijden gespeeld.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/56

    #Telstar #Bakker #ZuidKorea

  6. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Dussss je bent bakker, je hebt een gelikte website en zegt landelijke bezorging te hebben: "Wij zijn enorm trots dat we de eerste ambachtelijke bakker zijn in heel #Nederland die landelijke bezorging kan aanbieden"

    Maarrrr bij elk product staat: "De eerst mogelijke bezorgdatum voor je bestelling is 1 juli 2026" ๐Ÿ˜„ ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

    #bakker #eCommerce #Moederdag

  7. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Dussss je bent bakker, je hebt een gelikte website en zegt landelijke bezorging te hebben: "Wij zijn enorm trots dat we de eerste ambachtelijke bakker zijn in heel #Nederland die landelijke bezorging kan aanbieden"

    Maarrrr bij elk product staat: "De eerst mogelijke bezorgdatum voor je bestelling is 1 juli 2026" ๐Ÿ˜„ ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

    #bakker #eCommerce #Moederdag

  8. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Dussss je bent bakker, je hebt een gelikte website en zegt landelijke bezorging te hebben: "Wij zijn enorm trots dat we de eerste ambachtelijke bakker zijn in heel #Nederland die landelijke bezorging kan aanbieden"

    Maarrrr bij elk product staat: "De eerst mogelijke bezorgdatum voor je bestelling is 1 juli 2026" ๐Ÿ˜„ ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

    #bakker #eCommerce #Moederdag

  9. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Dussss je bent bakker, je hebt een gelikte website en zegt landelijke bezorging te hebben: "Wij zijn enorm trots dat we de eerste ambachtelijke bakker zijn in heel #Nederland die landelijke bezorging kan aanbieden"

    Maarrrr bij elk product staat: "De eerst mogelijke bezorgdatum voor je bestelling is 1 juli 2026" ๐Ÿ˜„ ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

    #bakker #eCommerce #Moederdag

  10. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Dussss je bent bakker, je hebt een gelikte website en zegt landelijke bezorging te hebben: "Wij zijn enorm trots dat we de eerste ambachtelijke bakker zijn in heel #Nederland die landelijke bezorging kan aanbieden"

    Maarrrr bij elk product staat: "De eerst mogelijke bezorgdatum voor je bestelling is 1 juli 2026" ๐Ÿ˜„ ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

    #bakker #eCommerce #Moederdag

  11. Van #stemhokje naar de warme #bakker... Was duidelijk niet de enige die dat een goed idee vond

  12. Van #stemhokje naar de warme #bakker... Was duidelijk niet de enige die dat een goed idee vond

  13. Van #stemhokje naar de warme #bakker... Was duidelijk niet de enige die dat een goed idee vond

  14. Van #stemhokje naar de warme #bakker... Was duidelijk niet de enige die dat een goed idee vond

  15. Van #stemhokje naar de warme #bakker... Was duidelijk niet de enige die dat een goed idee vond

  16. ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฝ๐˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ฒ

    Mede dankzij een treffer van Mitchel Bakker heeft Lille zijn vierde zege in de Champions League geboekt. De 24-jarige Nederlander maakte de 2-0 tijdens de 3-2-zege op Sturm Graz.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/54

    #Bakker #Lille #ChampionsLeague

  17. ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฝ๐˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ฒ

    Mede dankzij een treffer van Mitchel Bakker heeft Lille zijn vierde zege in de Champions League geboekt. De 24-jarige Nederlander maakte de 2-0 tijdens de 3-2-zege op Sturm Graz.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/54

    #Bakker #Lille #ChampionsLeague

  18. ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฝ๐˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ฒ

    Mede dankzij een treffer van Mitchel Bakker heeft Lille zijn vierde zege in de Champions League geboekt. De 24-jarige Nederlander maakte de 2-0 tijdens de 3-2-zege op Sturm Graz.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/54

    #Bakker #Lille #ChampionsLeague

  19. ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฝ๐˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ฒ

    Mede dankzij een treffer van Mitchel Bakker heeft Lille zijn vierde zege in de Champions League geboekt. De 24-jarige Nederlander maakte de 2-0 tijdens de 3-2-zege op Sturm Graz.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/54

    #Bakker #Lille #ChampionsLeague

  20. ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฝ๐˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ฒ

    Mede dankzij een treffer van Mitchel Bakker heeft Lille zijn vierde zege in de Champions League geboekt. De 24-jarige Nederlander maakte de 2-0 tijdens de 3-2-zege op Sturm Graz.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/54

    #Bakker #Lille #ChampionsLeague

  21. ๐—•๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ, ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜‡๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐—ณ ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—˜๐—ž ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ท๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป

    Denise Betsema heeft zich afgemeld voor het EK veldrijden van komend weekend. Ook Manon Bakker en Ryan Kamp doen niet mee in het Spaanse Pontevedra, maakte de KNWU bekend.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/54

    #Betsema #Bakker #EKveldrijden

  22. ๐—•๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ, ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜‡๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐—ณ ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—˜๐—ž ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ท๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป

    Denise Betsema heeft zich afgemeld voor het EK veldrijden van komend weekend. Ook Manon Bakker en Ryan Kamp doen niet mee in het Spaanse Pontevedra, maakte de KNWU bekend.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/54

    #Betsema #Bakker #EKveldrijden

  23. ๐—•๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ, ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜‡๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐—ณ ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—˜๐—ž ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ท๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป

    Denise Betsema heeft zich afgemeld voor het EK veldrijden van komend weekend. Ook Manon Bakker en Ryan Kamp doen niet mee in het Spaanse Pontevedra, maakte de KNWU bekend.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/54

    #Betsema #Bakker #EKveldrijden

  24. ๐—•๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ, ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜‡๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐—ณ ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—˜๐—ž ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ท๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป

    Denise Betsema heeft zich afgemeld voor het EK veldrijden van komend weekend. Ook Manon Bakker en Ryan Kamp doen niet mee in het Spaanse Pontevedra, maakte de KNWU bekend.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/54

    #Betsema #Bakker #EKveldrijden

  25. ๐—•๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ, ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜‡๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐—ณ ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—˜๐—ž ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ท๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป

    Denise Betsema heeft zich afgemeld voor het EK veldrijden van komend weekend. Ook Manon Bakker en Ryan Kamp doen niet mee in het Spaanse Pontevedra, maakte de KNWU bekend.

    rtl.nl/nieuws/sport/artikel/54

    #Betsema #Bakker #EKveldrijden

  26. A conversation.

    โ€œWhen experts disagree, usually the best thing to do is listen to what the majority of experts say. Thereโ€™s no guarantee that theyโ€™re right, but theyโ€™re more likely right than wrong. And if the majority view is overturned, itโ€™s almost guaranteed that this will be done by other experts in the field presenting evidence for the minority view, not by random kibitzers.โ€

    โ€œFor the history buffs in here, while most scientific knowledge is advanced incrementally, the true breakthroughs are usually ridiculed by the reigning experts. That is why appeals to authority are the worst kind of logical fallacy for a scientist.โ€

    โ€œThatโ€™s the pop-history version of scientific progress. The actual #history of #science is very different. Kind of like the difference between โ€˜history buffsโ€™ and historians.โ€

    ===

    Yes, there are examplesโ€”a fewโ€”of genuine breakthroughs that were ridiculed by the scientific establishment of the day. I bet you know what they are, because everyone does. They laughed at #Semmelweis, they laughed at #Wegner, they laughed at Luis and Walter #Alvarez, they laughed at #Marshall and #Warren. These things happened.

    But they did not laugh at #Galileo: indeed, they took his work with deadly seriousness. (And there really wasnโ€™t any such thing as a โ€œscientific establishmentโ€ at the time.) They did not laugh at #Newton, or #Watt, or #Darwin, or #Gibbs, or #Pasteur, or #Einstein, or #Curie, or #Heisenberg, or #Fisher, or #Watson and #Crick and poor unacknowledged #Franklin, or #Tharp and #Heezen, or #Ostrom and #Bakker, or #Hansen, or the vast majority of scientists whose work has fundamentally changed our understanding of the universe.

    At least if by โ€œtheyโ€ you mean scientists working in relevant fields, who understood the questions at hand โ€ฆ not, in most cases, scientists from other fields, or those with no scientific experience at all. Nor the religious and political ideologues who muddy the waters by creating fake โ€œcontroversiesโ€ to cast doubt on results they know are true, but cannot accept.

    In some cases they disagreed, quite vociferously. There were debates that descended into shouting matches, professional disagreements turned into personal feuds, once-eminent researchers become sad cranks, ruined careers and shortened lives. Yes. These things happened too, and thatโ€™s a tragedy.

    But most of the time, most researchers in the same fields as the revolutionaries said, โ€œOh, that makes sense!โ€ Problems that had seemed insoluble suddenly became simple, or at least it was possible to see how there might be an elegant solution. Major discoveries spawned a host of medium-sized ones, each of which in turn spawned endless minor onesโ€”and endless minor papers, academic bread and butter for when you canโ€™t get steak and lobster. Everyone wins.

    Those ideologues I mentioned above? They really, really want you to believe the narrative of ridicule. You might want to consider why.

  27. A conversation.

    โ€œWhen experts disagree, usually the best thing to do is listen to what the majority of experts say. Thereโ€™s no guarantee that theyโ€™re right, but theyโ€™re more likely right than wrong. And if the majority view is overturned, itโ€™s almost guaranteed that this will be done by other experts in the field presenting evidence for the minority view, not by random kibitzers.โ€

    โ€œFor the history buffs in here, while most scientific knowledge is advanced incrementally, the true breakthroughs are usually ridiculed by the reigning experts. That is why appeals to authority are the worst kind of logical fallacy for a scientist.โ€

    โ€œThatโ€™s the pop-history version of scientific progress. The actual #history of #science is very different. Kind of like the difference between โ€˜history buffsโ€™ and historians.โ€

    ===

    Yes, there are examplesโ€”a fewโ€”of genuine breakthroughs that were ridiculed by the scientific establishment of the day. I bet you know what they are, because everyone does. They laughed at #Semmelweis, they laughed at #Wegner, they laughed at Luis and Walter #Alvarez, they laughed at #Marshall and #Warren. These things happened.

    But they did not laugh at #Galileo: indeed, they took his work with deadly seriousness. (And there really wasnโ€™t any such thing as a โ€œscientific establishmentโ€ at the time.) They did not laugh at #Newton, or #Watt, or #Darwin, or #Gibbs, or #Pasteur, or #Einstein, or #Curie, or #Heisenberg, or #Fisher, or #Watson and #Crick and poor unacknowledged #Franklin, or #Tharp and #Heezen, or #Ostrom and #Bakker, or #Hansen, or the vast majority of scientists whose work has fundamentally changed our understanding of the universe.

    At least if by โ€œtheyโ€ you mean scientists working in relevant fields, who understood the questions at hand โ€ฆ not, in most cases, scientists from other fields, or those with no scientific experience at all. Nor the religious and political ideologues who muddy the waters by creating fake โ€œcontroversiesโ€ to cast doubt on results they know are true, but cannot accept.

    In some cases they disagreed, quite vociferously. There were debates that descended into shouting matches, professional disagreements turned into personal feuds, once-eminent researchers become sad cranks, ruined careers and shortened lives. Yes. These things happened too, and thatโ€™s a tragedy.

    But most of the time, most researchers in the same fields as the revolutionaries said, โ€œOh, that makes sense!โ€ Problems that had seemed insoluble suddenly became simple, or at least it was possible to see how there might be an elegant solution. Major discoveries spawned a host of medium-sized ones, each of which in turn spawned endless minor onesโ€”and endless minor papers, academic bread and butter for when you canโ€™t get steak and lobster. Everyone wins.

    Those ideologues I mentioned above? They really, really want you to believe the narrative of ridicule. You might want to consider why.

  28. A conversation.

    โ€œWhen experts disagree, usually the best thing to do is listen to what the majority of experts say. Thereโ€™s no guarantee that theyโ€™re right, but theyโ€™re more likely right than wrong. And if the majority view is overturned, itโ€™s almost guaranteed that this will be done by other experts in the field presenting evidence for the minority view, not by random kibitzers.โ€

    โ€œFor the history buffs in here, while most scientific knowledge is advanced incrementally, the true breakthroughs are usually ridiculed by the reigning experts. That is why appeals to authority are the worst kind of logical fallacy for a scientist.โ€

    โ€œThatโ€™s the pop-history version of scientific progress. The actual #history of #science is very different. Kind of like the difference between โ€˜history buffsโ€™ and historians.โ€

    ===

    Yes, there are examplesโ€”a fewโ€”of genuine breakthroughs that were ridiculed by the scientific establishment of the day. I bet you know what they are, because everyone does. They laughed at #Semmelweis, they laughed at #Wegner, they laughed at Luis and Walter #Alvarez, they laughed at #Marshall and #Warren. These things happened.

    But they did not laugh at #Galileo: indeed, they took his work with deadly seriousness. (And there really wasnโ€™t any such thing as a โ€œscientific establishmentโ€ at the time.) They did not laugh at #Newton, or #Watt, or #Darwin, or #Gibbs, or #Pasteur, or #Einstein, or #Curie, or #Heisenberg, or #Fisher, or #Watson and #Crick and poor unacknowledged #Franklin, or #Tharp and #Heezen, or #Ostrom and #Bakker, or #Hansen, or the vast majority of scientists whose work has fundamentally changed our understanding of the universe.

    At least if by โ€œtheyโ€ you mean scientists working in relevant fields, who understood the questions at hand โ€ฆ not, in most cases, scientists from other fields, or those with no scientific experience at all. Nor the religious and political ideologues who muddy the waters by creating fake โ€œcontroversiesโ€ to cast doubt on results they know are true, but cannot accept.

    In some cases they disagreed, quite vociferously. There were debates that descended into shouting matches, professional disagreements turned into personal feuds, once-eminent researchers become sad cranks, ruined careers and shortened lives. Yes. These things happened too, and thatโ€™s a tragedy.

    But most of the time, most researchers in the same fields as the revolutionaries said, โ€œOh, that makes sense!โ€ Problems that had seemed insoluble suddenly became simple, or at least it was possible to see how there might be an elegant solution. Major discoveries spawned a host of medium-sized ones, each of which in turn spawned endless minor onesโ€”and endless minor papers, academic bread and butter for when you canโ€™t get steak and lobster. Everyone wins.

    Those ideologues I mentioned above? They really, really want you to believe the narrative of ridicule. You might want to consider why.

  29. A conversation.

    โ€œWhen experts disagree, usually the best thing to do is listen to what the majority of experts say. Thereโ€™s no guarantee that theyโ€™re right, but theyโ€™re more likely right than wrong. And if the majority view is overturned, itโ€™s almost guaranteed that this will be done by other experts in the field presenting evidence for the minority view, not by random kibitzers.โ€

    โ€œFor the history buffs in here, while most scientific knowledge is advanced incrementally, the true breakthroughs are usually ridiculed by the reigning experts. That is why appeals to authority are the worst kind of logical fallacy for a scientist.โ€

    โ€œThatโ€™s the pop-history version of scientific progress. The actual #history of #science is very different. Kind of like the difference between โ€˜history buffsโ€™ and historians.โ€

    ===

    Yes, there are examplesโ€”a fewโ€”of genuine breakthroughs that were ridiculed by the scientific establishment of the day. I bet you know what they are, because everyone does. They laughed at #Semmelweis, they laughed at #Wegner, they laughed at Luis and Walter #Alvarez, they laughed at #Marshall and #Warren. These things happened.

    But they did not laugh at #Galileo: indeed, they took his work with deadly seriousness. (And there really wasnโ€™t any such thing as a โ€œscientific establishmentโ€ at the time.) They did not laugh at #Newton, or #Watt, or #Darwin, or #Gibbs, or #Pasteur, or #Einstein, or #Curie, or #Heisenberg, or #Fisher, or #Watson and #Crick and poor unacknowledged #Franklin, or #Tharp and #Heezen, or #Ostrom and #Bakker, or #Hansen, or the vast majority of scientists whose work has fundamentally changed our understanding of the universe.

    At least if by โ€œtheyโ€ you mean scientists working in relevant fields, who understood the questions at hand โ€ฆ not, in most cases, scientists from other fields, or those with no scientific experience at all. Nor the religious and political ideologues who muddy the waters by creating fake โ€œcontroversiesโ€ to cast doubt on results they know are true, but cannot accept.

    In some cases they disagreed, quite vociferously. There were debates that descended into shouting matches, professional disagreements turned into personal feuds, once-eminent researchers become sad cranks, ruined careers and shortened lives. Yes. These things happened too, and thatโ€™s a tragedy.

    But most of the time, most researchers in the same fields as the revolutionaries said, โ€œOh, that makes sense!โ€ Problems that had seemed insoluble suddenly became simple, or at least it was possible to see how there might be an elegant solution. Major discoveries spawned a host of medium-sized ones, each of which in turn spawned endless minor onesโ€”and endless minor papers, academic bread and butter for when you canโ€™t get steak and lobster. Everyone wins.

    Those ideologues I mentioned above? They really, really want you to believe the narrative of ridicule. You might want to consider why.

  30. #Atalanta, #Bakker al #Lille in prestito secco: il giocatore รจ giร  in aeroporto

  31. #Atalanta, #Bakker al #Lille in prestito secco: il giocatore รจ giร  in aeroporto

  32. #Atalanta, #Bakker al #Lille in prestito secco: il giocatore รจ giร  in aeroporto