#badspaniels — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #badspaniels, aggregated by home.social.
-
I don't know who needs to know this, but you can still buy your own #BadSpaniels toy on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Silly-Squeakers-Liquor-Spaniels-Squeaker/dp/B00N3X6JBU?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A1PA0BHWJSTAUZ&th=1
-
I don't know who needs to know this, but you can still buy your own #BadSpaniels toy on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Silly-Squeakers-Liquor-Spaniels-Squeaker/dp/B00N3X6JBU?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A1PA0BHWJSTAUZ&th=1
-
I don't know who needs to know this, but you can still buy your own #BadSpaniels toy on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Silly-Squeakers-Liquor-Spaniels-Squeaker/dp/B00N3X6JBU?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A1PA0BHWJSTAUZ&th=1
-
I don't know who needs to know this, but you can still buy your own #BadSpaniels toy on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Silly-Squeakers-Liquor-Spaniels-Squeaker/dp/B00N3X6JBU?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A1PA0BHWJSTAUZ&th=1
-
I don't know who needs to know this, but you can still buy your own #BadSpaniels toy on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Silly-Squeakers-Liquor-Spaniels-Squeaker/dp/B00N3X6JBU?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A1PA0BHWJSTAUZ&th=1
-
Luke Winkie on #BadSpaniels
"[T]he powers that be at Jack Daniel’s were so upset about this horrific incursion on their trademark that they took the issue all the way to the highest authority in the legal stratosphere, bringing to mind a third-grader who can’t back down from a dare."
https://slate.com/human-interest/2023/06/jack-daniels-supreme-court-ruling-dog-toy.html
-
Luke Winkie on #BadSpaniels
"[T]he powers that be at Jack Daniel’s were so upset about this horrific incursion on their trademark that they took the issue all the way to the highest authority in the legal stratosphere, bringing to mind a third-grader who can’t back down from a dare."
https://slate.com/human-interest/2023/06/jack-daniels-supreme-court-ruling-dog-toy.html
-
Luke Winkie on #BadSpaniels
"[T]he powers that be at Jack Daniel’s were so upset about this horrific incursion on their trademark that they took the issue all the way to the highest authority in the legal stratosphere, bringing to mind a third-grader who can’t back down from a dare."
https://slate.com/human-interest/2023/06/jack-daniels-supreme-court-ruling-dog-toy.html
-
Luke Winkie on #BadSpaniels
"[T]he powers that be at Jack Daniel’s were so upset about this horrific incursion on their trademark that they took the issue all the way to the highest authority in the legal stratosphere, bringing to mind a third-grader who can’t back down from a dare."
https://slate.com/human-interest/2023/06/jack-daniels-supreme-court-ruling-dog-toy.html
-
Luke Winkie on #BadSpaniels
"[T]he powers that be at Jack Daniel’s were so upset about this horrific incursion on their trademark that they took the issue all the way to the highest authority in the legal stratosphere, bringing to mind a third-grader who can’t back down from a dare."
https://slate.com/human-interest/2023/06/jack-daniels-supreme-court-ruling-dog-toy.html
-
"Today’s opinion is narrow. We do not decide whether the Rogers test is ever appropriate, or how far the 'noncommercial use' exclusion goes. On infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark. On dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source identifying."
-
"Today’s opinion is narrow. We do not decide whether the Rogers test is ever appropriate, or how far the 'noncommercial use' exclusion goes. On infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark. On dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source identifying."
-
"Today’s opinion is narrow. We do not decide whether the Rogers test is ever appropriate, or how far the 'noncommercial use' exclusion goes. On infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark. On dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source identifying."
-
"Today’s opinion is narrow. We do not decide whether the Rogers test is ever appropriate, or how far the 'noncommercial use' exclusion goes. On infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark. On dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source identifying."
-
"Today’s opinion is narrow. We do not decide whether the Rogers test is ever appropriate, or how far the 'noncommercial use' exclusion goes. On infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark. On dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source identifying."
-
SCOTUS cites Stacey Dogan and @marklemley in #BadSpaniels: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-148_3e04.pdf
-
SCOTUS cites Stacey Dogan and @marklemley in #BadSpaniels: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-148_3e04.pdf
-
SCOTUS cites Stacey Dogan and @marklemley in #BadSpaniels: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-148_3e04.pdf
-
SCOTUS cites Stacey Dogan and @marklemley in #BadSpaniels: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-148_3e04.pdf
-
SCOTUS cites Stacey Dogan and @marklemley in #BadSpaniels: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-148_3e04.pdf
-
SCOTUS: "We hold only that [the Rogers test] is not appropriate when the accused infringer has used a trademark to designate the source of its own goods—in other words, has used a trademark as a trademark. That kind of use falls within the heartland of trademark law, and does not receive special First Amendment protection."
-
SCOTUS: "We hold only that [the Rogers test] is not appropriate when the accused infringer has used a trademark to designate the source of its own goods—in other words, has used a trademark as a trademark. That kind of use falls within the heartland of trademark law, and does not receive special First Amendment protection."
-
SCOTUS: "We hold only that [the Rogers test] is not appropriate when the accused infringer has used a trademark to designate the source of its own goods—in other words, has used a trademark as a trademark. That kind of use falls within the heartland of trademark law, and does not receive special First Amendment protection."
-
SCOTUS: "We hold only that [the Rogers test] is not appropriate when the accused infringer has used a trademark to designate the source of its own goods—in other words, has used a trademark as a trademark. That kind of use falls within the heartland of trademark law, and does not receive special First Amendment protection."
-
SCOTUS: "We hold only that [the Rogers test] is not appropriate when the accused infringer has used a trademark to designate the source of its own goods—in other words, has used a trademark as a trademark. That kind of use falls within the heartland of trademark law, and does not receive special First Amendment protection."
-
It's a SCOTUS opinion day.
Will today be #BadSpaniels day?
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/jack-daniels-properties-inc-v-vip-products-llc-2/
-
It's a SCOTUS opinion day.
Will today be #BadSpaniels day?
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/jack-daniels-properties-inc-v-vip-products-llc-2/
-
It's a SCOTUS opinion day.
Will today be #BadSpaniels day?
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/jack-daniels-properties-inc-v-vip-products-llc-2/
-
It's a SCOTUS opinion day.
Will today be #BadSpaniels day?
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/jack-daniels-properties-inc-v-vip-products-llc-2/
-
It's a SCOTUS opinion day.
Will today be #BadSpaniels day?
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/jack-daniels-properties-inc-v-vip-products-llc-2/
-
Note that we don't yet have a decision in this term's trademark/First Amendment case, #BadSpaniels
-
Note that we don't yet have a decision in this term's trademark/First Amendment case, #BadSpaniels
-
Note that we don't yet have a decision in this term's trademark/First Amendment case, #BadSpaniels
-
Note that we don't yet have a decision in this term's trademark/First Amendment case, #BadSpaniels
-
Note that we don't yet have a decision in this term's trademark/First Amendment case, #BadSpaniels
-
It's a decision day at SCOTUS.
Will we get #BadSpaniels? #Goldsmith (the Andy Warhol case over the Prince portraits)? #AmgenVersusSanofi?
Stay tuned.
-
It's a decision day at SCOTUS.
Will we get #BadSpaniels? #Goldsmith (the Andy Warhol case over the Prince portraits)? #AmgenVersusSanofi?
Stay tuned.
-
It's a decision day at SCOTUS.
Will we get #BadSpaniels? #Goldsmith (the Andy Warhol case over the Prince portraits)? #AmgenVersusSanofi?
Stay tuned.
-
It's a decision day at SCOTUS.
Will we get #BadSpaniels? #Goldsmith (the Andy Warhol case over the Prince portraits)? #AmgenVersusSanofi?
Stay tuned.
-
It's a decision day at SCOTUS.
Will we get #BadSpaniels? #Goldsmith (the Andy Warhol case over the Prince portraits)? #AmgenVersusSanofi?
Stay tuned.
-
A conversation between @rtushnet and @lexlanham about #BadSpaniels? Yes, please! You, too, can sign up to attend (onsite or online) for free: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/bad-spaniels-trademark-parody-and-fair-use-doctrines-tickets-603820953727
-
A conversation between @rtushnet and @lexlanham about #BadSpaniels? Yes, please! You, too, can sign up to attend (onsite or online) for free: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/bad-spaniels-trademark-parody-and-fair-use-doctrines-tickets-603820953727
-
A conversation between @rtushnet and @lexlanham about #BadSpaniels? Yes, please! You, too, can sign up to attend (onsite or online) for free: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/bad-spaniels-trademark-parody-and-fair-use-doctrines-tickets-603820953727
-
A conversation between @rtushnet and @lexlanham about #BadSpaniels? Yes, please! You, too, can sign up to attend (onsite or online) for free: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/bad-spaniels-trademark-parody-and-fair-use-doctrines-tickets-603820953727
-
A conversation between @rtushnet and @lexlanham about #BadSpaniels? Yes, please! You, too, can sign up to attend (onsite or online) for free: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/bad-spaniels-trademark-parody-and-fair-use-doctrines-tickets-603820953727
-
I thought #BadSpaniels would be the more quotable argument but so far, #AmgenVersusSanofi is definitely winning. #PatentFedi
-
I thought #BadSpaniels would be the more quotable argument but so far, #AmgenVersusSanofi is definitely winning. #PatentFedi
-
I thought #BadSpaniels would be the more quotable argument but so far, #AmgenVersusSanofi is definitely winning. #PatentFedi
-
I thought #BadSpaniels would be the more quotable argument but so far, #AmgenVersusSanofi is definitely winning. #PatentFedi
-
I thought #BadSpaniels would be the more quotable argument but so far, #AmgenVersusSanofi is definitely winning. #PatentFedi
-
If you couldn't listen live yesterday, you can find the oral argument recording here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2022/22-148
And the transcript here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2022/22-148_21o3.pdf
-
If you couldn't listen live yesterday, you can find the oral argument recording here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2022/22-148
And the transcript here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2022/22-148_21o3.pdf
-
If you couldn't listen live yesterday, you can find the oral argument recording here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2022/22-148
And the transcript here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2022/22-148_21o3.pdf
-
If you couldn't listen live yesterday, you can find the oral argument recording here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2022/22-148
And the transcript here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2022/22-148_21o3.pdf
-
If you couldn't listen live yesterday, you can find the oral argument recording here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2022/22-148
And the transcript here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2022/22-148_21o3.pdf