home.social

#autopoietic — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #autopoietic, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. The Autopoietic Paradigm: Refuting the AI Tech Bubble through Vibe Coding and the Resident Agent… Image by VECTORFORGE Gemini AI™ The Autopoietic Paradigm: Refuting the AI Tech Bubble through ...

    #autopoietic #self-healting-software #ai-bubble-myth #radegenbiotechnology #ai-revolution

    Origin | Interest | Match
  2. Life as an - Attempt of a -#realistic elucidation -

    Part 2 "#Theories of in a view"

    For this purpose I would like to describe first of all the initial problem in the of evolution, which can be regarded as an example of the "#underdetermination of theories by the " (Bas van Fraassen).

    More on: philosophies.de/index.php/2022

  3. Life as an - Attempt of a - Part 1

    The project pursues the ambitious goal of the -#organization of as an , but in the sense of a demarcation from the "tertium non datur" of classical (George Niklas ) as a "#difference" of "#system vs. or of "inside vs. outside".

    More at: philosophies.de/index.php/2022

  4. 1️⃣ Kihbernetic #System with
    2️⃣ fundamental #Processes: a recursive #Autopoietic self-production for growth and learning, and a linear #Allopoietic production of “other things”, such as behavior and waste, distributed in
    3️⃣ Control #Levels, of #Regulation, immersed in, and dealing with things in the system’s environment, #Control for managing the workload of different regulators, and #Guidance to provide long-term goals and preserve the identity of the system, all using
    4️⃣ #Variables: sensory #Input of data and other resources, motor #Output of behavior, #Information as the difference that will make a difference in the subsequent (updated) #Knowledge state, all interconnecting
    5️⃣ #Functions: the #Control-ed #Reaction to external stimuli, the #Perception of sensory states, the #Prediction of the expected outcome of past behavior, and the repeated #Integration of new information into an updated knowledge state.

  5. The thought experiment in this interesting 2019 article from Michael Lachmann and Sara Walker on the contrast between #life and #living is not representative, because von Neumann’s UCs are non-#autopoietic and don’t print themselves so can’t #grow and #evolve.

    Imagine you have built a sophisticated 3D printer called Alice, the first to be able to print itself. As with von Neumann’s constructor, you supply it with information specifying its own plan, and a mechanism for copying that information: Alice is now a complete von Neumann constructor. Have you created new life on Earth?

    aeon.co/essays/what-can-schrod

    The difference lies in the fact that UC “mechanisms” are not operational until their production is fully finished and any #error will most probably prevent the mechanism from working, while most living and growing “assemblies” can work and repair themselves while they are growing.

    The bottom line is that life cannot be created. It has to emerge from mechanical non-life.

  6. @ShadSterling

    Yes, that was the beginning.
    And the more I read, the more I am convinced that we will not have to wait for the next decade to see #autopoietic systems capable of self-reference and -development.

    My gut feeling from what I have read (and studied of the former) natural-language learning and how infants learn to "grasp reality", is that this will happen very swiftly when we let even only a couple of #robots, connected...

    @simon @annaleen @BBCWorld

  7. @ShadSterling @simon @annaleen @BBCWorld
    (7/n)

    ...If you check the prerequisites for #autopoietic systems (as developed by #Varela), we might reach the conclusion that #GAI is already quite close to #Autopoiesis.
    (Note:
    The late #NiklasLuhmann is 1 of the most difficult authors to read and his works are chiefly available in German; I haven't studied him in a long time, so I cannot apply his whole concept to #AI, of which I also do not enough of).
    Why does #Autopoiesis + #SocialSystemsTheory..

  8. Must-watch: John Vervaeke on what #AI developments tell us of the coming key infliction points, where we need to make decisions.

    One key point coming very soon is #embodiment of AI in #automatic #autopoietic systems, systems that have needs and take care of themselves.

    We may think we don’t want to do that, because when you have that, all the components intellect like ours needs to rise exist

    But we might still create sex robots, setting a path for emergence of that.

    youtu.be/A-_RdKiDbz4

  9. Life as an #autopoietic #system - Attempt of a #structure-#realistic elucidation -.

    Part 2 "Theories of #evolution in a structural realist view".

    More on: philosophies.de/index.php/2022

    There is an orange translation button „Translate>>“ for English in the lower left corner!

  10. Life as an #Autopoietic #System - Attempt of a #Structural #Realistic Enlightenment - Part 1

    The guest article "Self-organization seen from the inside - or: how does life work" by Dr. Wolfgang Stegemann represents the first part of our planned joint venture.

    More at: philosophies.de/index.php/2022

    There is an orange translation button "Translate>>" at the bottom left.

  11. The main difference between “man-made” machines and other simple physical #structures (#products) and #autonomous, living #systems is in the way they are “produced”.

    Machines are #built from the #outside by an #allopoietic process similar to #sedimentation of placing layer upon layer of “things” and connecting them to “inform” a unified single structure.

    Organisms, on the other side, are single unified and integrated entities from the moment of their inception, and all their “components” #grow from the #inside out in parallel and at the same time in a closed circular #autopoietic process.

  12. Reading this recent (2022) article from Fritjof Capra:
    The organization of the living:
    Maturana’s key insights
    included in the latest Constructivist Foundations volume 18(1): 005–011

    constructivist.info/18/1/005

    and I am continually bewildered by the fact that no one in the #Constructivist field figured out yet that #Autopoiesis, although necessary, is not the sufficient condition for #Life.

    All #LivingSystems are in fact #DynamicalSystems with memory made of #Material, #Energy, and #Information structures participating continually in both auto- and allopoietic processes.

    In fact, the recursive, #Autopoietic processes of learning and growth depend only on (are “structurally coupled” with) the linear #Allopoietic work processes dealing with all the things (resources, waste) in the system’s environment and producing the externally observable #behavior of the living (dynamical) system.

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.