home.social

#arrogance — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #arrogance, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Teacher’s Arrogance: Why Is It A Big Problem?


    Teachers hold an unusual kind of power. They do not merely explain algebra, mark essays, or attempt to persuade thirty teenagers that Shakespeare is more exciting than a bin bag. They influence how young people see knowledge, authority and, crucially, themselves. A good teacher can make a pupil believe they are capable of things they had never imagined. An arrogant teacher can make them believe the opposite, often before the bell has rung for lunch.

    Teacher’s arrogance is a big problem because it damages learning, confidence and trust. It turns a classroom from a place of curiosity into a small court, with one person permanently seated on the throne and everyone else expected to nod respectfully. Of course, teachers need confidence: nobody wants a maths lesson led by someone who introduces fractions with, “I’m fairly sure this is right, but do check the internet.” Confidence and arrogance, however, are not the same thing. Confidence says, “I know this subject and I can help you understand it.” Arrogance says, “I know this subject, therefore I am also wiser than you about everything, including your own experience.” That distinction matters enormously.

    At its simplest, arrogance is an inflated sense of one’s own importance or correctness, often combined with a reluctance to listen. In a teacher, it may appear as dismissing questions, mocking mistakes, refusing to admit errors, treating pupils as naturally lazy, or believing that a qualification automatically makes every decision beyond criticism. It can be loud and obvious: the teacher who humiliates a child for getting an answer wrong. But it can also be quieter: the teacher who never asks for feedback, who assumes a struggling pupil is not trying, or who talks about pupils rather than with them.

    The classroom is especially vulnerable to this behaviour because pupils cannot simply leave. Adults encountering a rude customer-service worker can complain, walk away, or at least conduct a furious review of the café while drinking their overpriced flat white. Pupils, by contrast, are required to remain in the room, listen to the adult in charge and often depend on that adult for grades, recommendations and support. This imbalance makes an arrogant teacher’s attitude more powerful than an ordinary unpleasant interaction. A careless remark from a teacher can stay with a pupil for years.

    One of the biggest consequences of teacher’s arrogance is the fear of making mistakes. Learning depends on mistakes. Nobody learns to write, calculate, speak a new language or play the trumpet perfectly on the first attempt. In fact, if someone does play the trumpet perfectly on their first attempt, they should probably be investigated by a team of scientists. Mistakes are evidence that a person is attempting something difficult. Yet an arrogant teacher may treat mistakes as proof of stupidity or poor character. Pupils then become more concerned with avoiding embarrassment than with understanding the work.

    When this happens, questions disappear from the classroom. A pupil who has been laughed at for asking for clarification will not ask again. They may copy from a friend, guess, remain silent or decide that the subject is “not for people like me”. The teacher may then interpret the silence as a sign that everyone understands, which is rather like assuming a room is full because nobody has complained about the seating. In reality, the silence may be full of confusion.

    Arrogance also prevents teachers from recognising that pupils learn in different ways and arrive with different circumstances. Some children have quiet places to study, well-stocked bookshelves and adults at home who can help with homework. Others may share bedrooms, care for siblings, struggle with anxiety, have additional learning needs, or be learning English alongside everything else. A teacher who assumes every pupil begins from the same position may mistake disadvantage for laziness. This is not only unfair; it is educationally useless. Telling a pupil to “try harder” is not a strategy if the actual problem is that they do not understand the instructions, cannot access the material, or are too worried to concentrate.

    An arrogant approach often relies on labels. Pupils become “the clever ones”, “the troublemakers”, “the quiet ones”, or “the ones who will never be academic”. Labels are tempting because they make a complicated class feel easier to manage. They are also dangerous because pupils can start behaving according to the role they have been assigned. If a teacher repeatedly treats someone as disruptive, that pupil may conclude that disruption is the only identity available to them. If another pupil is praised only for being naturally bright, they may become afraid of difficult tasks that might reveal they are not effortlessly brilliant after all.

    The idea that intelligence is fixed is particularly harmful. An arrogant teacher may enjoy being seen as the expert and may, perhaps without meaning to, encourage the belief that talent belongs to a select group. But education should teach that skills can grow through practice, feedback and perseverance. A pupil who cannot solve an equation today may be able to solve one next month. A pupil whose first essay resembles a distressed shopping list may eventually write beautifully. Teachers should offer guidance without turning themselves into gatekeepers of who is allowed to succeed.

    Another serious problem is that arrogant teachers model poor behaviour. Young people learn not only from what adults say but from how adults act. A teacher who demands respect while showing none teaches pupils that authority means being obeyed, not being fair. A teacher who refuses to admit a mistake teaches that being wrong is shameful. A teacher who interrupts, mocks or ignores people teaches that power gives permission to behave badly. This is a bleak lesson, and it is one pupils may carry into workplaces, families and public life.

    By contrast, a teacher who says, “I explained that badly; let me try again,” demonstrates maturity. Far from weakening their authority, this usually strengthens it. Pupils tend to respect adults who are knowledgeable but human. There is something reassuring about seeing a teacher correct an error without collapsing into dramatic despair. Nobody expects perfection. They simply want evidence that fairness applies to everyone, including the person with the whiteboard pen.

    Teacher’s arrogance can also harm relationships with parents and colleagues. Education works best when teachers, families and support staff communicate honestly. An arrogant teacher may assume that parents are interfering, that teaching assistants have little to contribute, or that colleagues who suggest a different method are questioning their competence. This can create a defensive atmosphere in which useful information is ignored. A parent may know that a child is coping with a major change at home. A teaching assistant may notice that a pupil understands better when shown a visual example. A colleague may have a practical solution to a recurring problem. None of this is an attack on the teacher. It is part of the shared work of helping children learn.

    There is also a wider issue of trust in education. Teachers are rightly given responsibility because society values education. But authority without accountability can become harmful. Pupils need to know that they can raise concerns and be listened to. Schools need systems that allow feedback without making children feel they are risking punishment. This does not mean that every pupil complaint is automatically correct, or that teachers must turn lessons into a daily referendum. It means that adults should be prepared to reflect on their conduct. Listening is not surrender; it is professional strength.

    It is important to acknowledge that teaching is difficult. Teachers face large classes, paperwork, behaviour issues, limited time and the mysterious disappearance of glue sticks. Stress and exhaustion can make anyone short-tempered. Not every firm instruction or impatient moment is arrogance. Teachers are allowed to have bad days; most people would be slightly frazzled after explaining the same point six times while someone asks whether it will be “on the test”. The concern is a persistent attitude of superiority: the belief that pupils’ feelings, questions and perspectives are beneath consideration.

    Preventing arrogance begins with humility. Humility does not mean pretending not to know things. It means recognising that knowledge brings responsibility. Teachers should be experts in their subjects, but they should also remain learners: learning from research, from colleagues, from parents and from pupils themselves. They can invite questions, welcome constructive feedback and distinguish between challenging poor behaviour and humiliating a child. Schools can support this by encouraging mentoring, training and open conversations about classroom practice rather than treating criticism as a personal insult.

    Pupils, too, should be taught that respect is mutual. They should understand that teachers deserve courtesy and that classrooms need rules. But they should also know that it is reasonable to ask for help, to disagree politely and to expect fair treatment. Education should prepare young people to think, not simply to obey. A classroom where pupils can speak honestly is more likely to produce confident, thoughtful adults than one where silence is mistaken for discipline.

    Ultimately, teacher’s arrogance is a big problem because it wastes potential. It can make bright pupils doubt themselves, struggling pupils give up and quiet pupils disappear into the background. It can turn education into a performance of authority rather than a partnership in learning. The best teachers do not need to prove that they are the cleverest person in the room. Usually, they are too busy helping everyone else become cleverer. That is not weakness. It is the real confidence at the heart of teaching.

    #arrogance #education #learning #schools #teachers #teachersArrogance #teaching #writing
  2. Teacher’s Arrogance: Why Is It A Big Problem?


    Teachers hold an unusual kind of power. They do not merely explain algebra, mark essays, or attempt to persuade thirty teenagers that Shakespeare is more exciting than a bin bag. They influence how young people see knowledge, authority and, crucially, themselves. A good teacher can make a pupil believe they are capable of things they had never imagined. An arrogant teacher can make them believe the opposite, often before the bell has rung for lunch.

    Teacher’s arrogance is a big problem because it damages learning, confidence and trust. It turns a classroom from a place of curiosity into a small court, with one person permanently seated on the throne and everyone else expected to nod respectfully. Of course, teachers need confidence: nobody wants a maths lesson led by someone who introduces fractions with, “I’m fairly sure this is right, but do check the internet.” Confidence and arrogance, however, are not the same thing. Confidence says, “I know this subject and I can help you understand it.” Arrogance says, “I know this subject, therefore I am also wiser than you about everything, including your own experience.” That distinction matters enormously.

    At its simplest, arrogance is an inflated sense of one’s own importance or correctness, often combined with a reluctance to listen. In a teacher, it may appear as dismissing questions, mocking mistakes, refusing to admit errors, treating pupils as naturally lazy, or believing that a qualification automatically makes every decision beyond criticism. It can be loud and obvious: the teacher who humiliates a child for getting an answer wrong. But it can also be quieter: the teacher who never asks for feedback, who assumes a struggling pupil is not trying, or who talks about pupils rather than with them.

    The classroom is especially vulnerable to this behaviour because pupils cannot simply leave. Adults encountering a rude customer-service worker can complain, walk away, or at least conduct a furious review of the café while drinking their overpriced flat white. Pupils, by contrast, are required to remain in the room, listen to the adult in charge and often depend on that adult for grades, recommendations and support. This imbalance makes an arrogant teacher’s attitude more powerful than an ordinary unpleasant interaction. A careless remark from a teacher can stay with a pupil for years.

    One of the biggest consequences of teacher’s arrogance is the fear of making mistakes. Learning depends on mistakes. Nobody learns to write, calculate, speak a new language or play the trumpet perfectly on the first attempt. In fact, if someone does play the trumpet perfectly on their first attempt, they should probably be investigated by a team of scientists. Mistakes are evidence that a person is attempting something difficult. Yet an arrogant teacher may treat mistakes as proof of stupidity or poor character. Pupils then become more concerned with avoiding embarrassment than with understanding the work.

    When this happens, questions disappear from the classroom. A pupil who has been laughed at for asking for clarification will not ask again. They may copy from a friend, guess, remain silent or decide that the subject is “not for people like me”. The teacher may then interpret the silence as a sign that everyone understands, which is rather like assuming a room is full because nobody has complained about the seating. In reality, the silence may be full of confusion.

    Arrogance also prevents teachers from recognising that pupils learn in different ways and arrive with different circumstances. Some children have quiet places to study, well-stocked bookshelves and adults at home who can help with homework. Others may share bedrooms, care for siblings, struggle with anxiety, have additional learning needs, or be learning English alongside everything else. A teacher who assumes every pupil begins from the same position may mistake disadvantage for laziness. This is not only unfair; it is educationally useless. Telling a pupil to “try harder” is not a strategy if the actual problem is that they do not understand the instructions, cannot access the material, or are too worried to concentrate.

    An arrogant approach often relies on labels. Pupils become “the clever ones”, “the troublemakers”, “the quiet ones”, or “the ones who will never be academic”. Labels are tempting because they make a complicated class feel easier to manage. They are also dangerous because pupils can start behaving according to the role they have been assigned. If a teacher repeatedly treats someone as disruptive, that pupil may conclude that disruption is the only identity available to them. If another pupil is praised only for being naturally bright, they may become afraid of difficult tasks that might reveal they are not effortlessly brilliant after all.

    The idea that intelligence is fixed is particularly harmful. An arrogant teacher may enjoy being seen as the expert and may, perhaps without meaning to, encourage the belief that talent belongs to a select group. But education should teach that skills can grow through practice, feedback and perseverance. A pupil who cannot solve an equation today may be able to solve one next month. A pupil whose first essay resembles a distressed shopping list may eventually write beautifully. Teachers should offer guidance without turning themselves into gatekeepers of who is allowed to succeed.

    Another serious problem is that arrogant teachers model poor behaviour. Young people learn not only from what adults say but from how adults act. A teacher who demands respect while showing none teaches pupils that authority means being obeyed, not being fair. A teacher who refuses to admit a mistake teaches that being wrong is shameful. A teacher who interrupts, mocks or ignores people teaches that power gives permission to behave badly. This is a bleak lesson, and it is one pupils may carry into workplaces, families and public life.

    By contrast, a teacher who says, “I explained that badly; let me try again,” demonstrates maturity. Far from weakening their authority, this usually strengthens it. Pupils tend to respect adults who are knowledgeable but human. There is something reassuring about seeing a teacher correct an error without collapsing into dramatic despair. Nobody expects perfection. They simply want evidence that fairness applies to everyone, including the person with the whiteboard pen.

    Teacher’s arrogance can also harm relationships with parents and colleagues. Education works best when teachers, families and support staff communicate honestly. An arrogant teacher may assume that parents are interfering, that teaching assistants have little to contribute, or that colleagues who suggest a different method are questioning their competence. This can create a defensive atmosphere in which useful information is ignored. A parent may know that a child is coping with a major change at home. A teaching assistant may notice that a pupil understands better when shown a visual example. A colleague may have a practical solution to a recurring problem. None of this is an attack on the teacher. It is part of the shared work of helping children learn.

    There is also a wider issue of trust in education. Teachers are rightly given responsibility because society values education. But authority without accountability can become harmful. Pupils need to know that they can raise concerns and be listened to. Schools need systems that allow feedback without making children feel they are risking punishment. This does not mean that every pupil complaint is automatically correct, or that teachers must turn lessons into a daily referendum. It means that adults should be prepared to reflect on their conduct. Listening is not surrender; it is professional strength.

    It is important to acknowledge that teaching is difficult. Teachers face large classes, paperwork, behaviour issues, limited time and the mysterious disappearance of glue sticks. Stress and exhaustion can make anyone short-tempered. Not every firm instruction or impatient moment is arrogance. Teachers are allowed to have bad days; most people would be slightly frazzled after explaining the same point six times while someone asks whether it will be “on the test”. The concern is a persistent attitude of superiority: the belief that pupils’ feelings, questions and perspectives are beneath consideration.

    Preventing arrogance begins with humility. Humility does not mean pretending not to know things. It means recognising that knowledge brings responsibility. Teachers should be experts in their subjects, but they should also remain learners: learning from research, from colleagues, from parents and from pupils themselves. They can invite questions, welcome constructive feedback and distinguish between challenging poor behaviour and humiliating a child. Schools can support this by encouraging mentoring, training and open conversations about classroom practice rather than treating criticism as a personal insult.

    Pupils, too, should be taught that respect is mutual. They should understand that teachers deserve courtesy and that classrooms need rules. But they should also know that it is reasonable to ask for help, to disagree politely and to expect fair treatment. Education should prepare young people to think, not simply to obey. A classroom where pupils can speak honestly is more likely to produce confident, thoughtful adults than one where silence is mistaken for discipline.

    Ultimately, teacher’s arrogance is a big problem because it wastes potential. It can make bright pupils doubt themselves, struggling pupils give up and quiet pupils disappear into the background. It can turn education into a performance of authority rather than a partnership in learning. The best teachers do not need to prove that they are the cleverest person in the room. Usually, they are too busy helping everyone else become cleverer. That is not weakness. It is the real confidence at the heart of teaching.

    #arrogance #education #learning #schools #teachers #teachersArrogance #teaching #writing
  3. Teacher’s Arrogance: Why Is It A Big Problem?


    Teachers hold an unusual kind of power. They do not merely explain algebra, mark essays, or attempt to persuade thirty teenagers that Shakespeare is more exciting than a bin bag. They influence how young people see knowledge, authority and, crucially, themselves. A good teacher can make a pupil believe they are capable of things they had never imagined. An arrogant teacher can make them believe the opposite, often before the bell has rung for lunch.

    Teacher’s arrogance is a big problem because it damages learning, confidence and trust. It turns a classroom from a place of curiosity into a small court, with one person permanently seated on the throne and everyone else expected to nod respectfully. Of course, teachers need confidence: nobody wants a maths lesson led by someone who introduces fractions with, “I’m fairly sure this is right, but do check the internet.” Confidence and arrogance, however, are not the same thing. Confidence says, “I know this subject and I can help you understand it.” Arrogance says, “I know this subject, therefore I am also wiser than you about everything, including your own experience.” That distinction matters enormously.

    At its simplest, arrogance is an inflated sense of one’s own importance or correctness, often combined with a reluctance to listen. In a teacher, it may appear as dismissing questions, mocking mistakes, refusing to admit errors, treating pupils as naturally lazy, or believing that a qualification automatically makes every decision beyond criticism. It can be loud and obvious: the teacher who humiliates a child for getting an answer wrong. But it can also be quieter: the teacher who never asks for feedback, who assumes a struggling pupil is not trying, or who talks about pupils rather than with them.

    The classroom is especially vulnerable to this behaviour because pupils cannot simply leave. Adults encountering a rude customer-service worker can complain, walk away, or at least conduct a furious review of the café while drinking their overpriced flat white. Pupils, by contrast, are required to remain in the room, listen to the adult in charge and often depend on that adult for grades, recommendations and support. This imbalance makes an arrogant teacher’s attitude more powerful than an ordinary unpleasant interaction. A careless remark from a teacher can stay with a pupil for years.

    One of the biggest consequences of teacher’s arrogance is the fear of making mistakes. Learning depends on mistakes. Nobody learns to write, calculate, speak a new language or play the trumpet perfectly on the first attempt. In fact, if someone does play the trumpet perfectly on their first attempt, they should probably be investigated by a team of scientists. Mistakes are evidence that a person is attempting something difficult. Yet an arrogant teacher may treat mistakes as proof of stupidity or poor character. Pupils then become more concerned with avoiding embarrassment than with understanding the work.

    When this happens, questions disappear from the classroom. A pupil who has been laughed at for asking for clarification will not ask again. They may copy from a friend, guess, remain silent or decide that the subject is “not for people like me”. The teacher may then interpret the silence as a sign that everyone understands, which is rather like assuming a room is full because nobody has complained about the seating. In reality, the silence may be full of confusion.

    Arrogance also prevents teachers from recognising that pupils learn in different ways and arrive with different circumstances. Some children have quiet places to study, well-stocked bookshelves and adults at home who can help with homework. Others may share bedrooms, care for siblings, struggle with anxiety, have additional learning needs, or be learning English alongside everything else. A teacher who assumes every pupil begins from the same position may mistake disadvantage for laziness. This is not only unfair; it is educationally useless. Telling a pupil to “try harder” is not a strategy if the actual problem is that they do not understand the instructions, cannot access the material, or are too worried to concentrate.

    An arrogant approach often relies on labels. Pupils become “the clever ones”, “the troublemakers”, “the quiet ones”, or “the ones who will never be academic”. Labels are tempting because they make a complicated class feel easier to manage. They are also dangerous because pupils can start behaving according to the role they have been assigned. If a teacher repeatedly treats someone as disruptive, that pupil may conclude that disruption is the only identity available to them. If another pupil is praised only for being naturally bright, they may become afraid of difficult tasks that might reveal they are not effortlessly brilliant after all.

    The idea that intelligence is fixed is particularly harmful. An arrogant teacher may enjoy being seen as the expert and may, perhaps without meaning to, encourage the belief that talent belongs to a select group. But education should teach that skills can grow through practice, feedback and perseverance. A pupil who cannot solve an equation today may be able to solve one next month. A pupil whose first essay resembles a distressed shopping list may eventually write beautifully. Teachers should offer guidance without turning themselves into gatekeepers of who is allowed to succeed.

    Another serious problem is that arrogant teachers model poor behaviour. Young people learn not only from what adults say but from how adults act. A teacher who demands respect while showing none teaches pupils that authority means being obeyed, not being fair. A teacher who refuses to admit a mistake teaches that being wrong is shameful. A teacher who interrupts, mocks or ignores people teaches that power gives permission to behave badly. This is a bleak lesson, and it is one pupils may carry into workplaces, families and public life.

    By contrast, a teacher who says, “I explained that badly; let me try again,” demonstrates maturity. Far from weakening their authority, this usually strengthens it. Pupils tend to respect adults who are knowledgeable but human. There is something reassuring about seeing a teacher correct an error without collapsing into dramatic despair. Nobody expects perfection. They simply want evidence that fairness applies to everyone, including the person with the whiteboard pen.

    Teacher’s arrogance can also harm relationships with parents and colleagues. Education works best when teachers, families and support staff communicate honestly. An arrogant teacher may assume that parents are interfering, that teaching assistants have little to contribute, or that colleagues who suggest a different method are questioning their competence. This can create a defensive atmosphere in which useful information is ignored. A parent may know that a child is coping with a major change at home. A teaching assistant may notice that a pupil understands better when shown a visual example. A colleague may have a practical solution to a recurring problem. None of this is an attack on the teacher. It is part of the shared work of helping children learn.

    There is also a wider issue of trust in education. Teachers are rightly given responsibility because society values education. But authority without accountability can become harmful. Pupils need to know that they can raise concerns and be listened to. Schools need systems that allow feedback without making children feel they are risking punishment. This does not mean that every pupil complaint is automatically correct, or that teachers must turn lessons into a daily referendum. It means that adults should be prepared to reflect on their conduct. Listening is not surrender; it is professional strength.

    It is important to acknowledge that teaching is difficult. Teachers face large classes, paperwork, behaviour issues, limited time and the mysterious disappearance of glue sticks. Stress and exhaustion can make anyone short-tempered. Not every firm instruction or impatient moment is arrogance. Teachers are allowed to have bad days; most people would be slightly frazzled after explaining the same point six times while someone asks whether it will be “on the test”. The concern is a persistent attitude of superiority: the belief that pupils’ feelings, questions and perspectives are beneath consideration.

    Preventing arrogance begins with humility. Humility does not mean pretending not to know things. It means recognising that knowledge brings responsibility. Teachers should be experts in their subjects, but they should also remain learners: learning from research, from colleagues, from parents and from pupils themselves. They can invite questions, welcome constructive feedback and distinguish between challenging poor behaviour and humiliating a child. Schools can support this by encouraging mentoring, training and open conversations about classroom practice rather than treating criticism as a personal insult.

    Pupils, too, should be taught that respect is mutual. They should understand that teachers deserve courtesy and that classrooms need rules. But they should also know that it is reasonable to ask for help, to disagree politely and to expect fair treatment. Education should prepare young people to think, not simply to obey. A classroom where pupils can speak honestly is more likely to produce confident, thoughtful adults than one where silence is mistaken for discipline.

    Ultimately, teacher’s arrogance is a big problem because it wastes potential. It can make bright pupils doubt themselves, struggling pupils give up and quiet pupils disappear into the background. It can turn education into a performance of authority rather than a partnership in learning. The best teachers do not need to prove that they are the cleverest person in the room. Usually, they are too busy helping everyone else become cleverer. That is not weakness. It is the real confidence at the heart of teaching.

    #arrogance #education #learning #schools #teachers #teachersArrogance #teaching #writing
  4. Teacher’s Arrogance: Why Is It A Big Problem?


    Teachers hold an unusual kind of power. They do not merely explain algebra, mark essays, or attempt to persuade thirty teenagers that Shakespeare is more exciting than a bin bag. They influence how young people see knowledge, authority and, crucially, themselves. A good teacher can make a pupil believe they are capable of things they had never imagined. An arrogant teacher can make them believe the opposite, often before the bell has rung for lunch.

    Teacher’s arrogance is a big problem because it damages learning, confidence and trust. It turns a classroom from a place of curiosity into a small court, with one person permanently seated on the throne and everyone else expected to nod respectfully. Of course, teachers need confidence: nobody wants a maths lesson led by someone who introduces fractions with, “I’m fairly sure this is right, but do check the internet.” Confidence and arrogance, however, are not the same thing. Confidence says, “I know this subject and I can help you understand it.” Arrogance says, “I know this subject, therefore I am also wiser than you about everything, including your own experience.” That distinction matters enormously.

    At its simplest, arrogance is an inflated sense of one’s own importance or correctness, often combined with a reluctance to listen. In a teacher, it may appear as dismissing questions, mocking mistakes, refusing to admit errors, treating pupils as naturally lazy, or believing that a qualification automatically makes every decision beyond criticism. It can be loud and obvious: the teacher who humiliates a child for getting an answer wrong. But it can also be quieter: the teacher who never asks for feedback, who assumes a struggling pupil is not trying, or who talks about pupils rather than with them.

    The classroom is especially vulnerable to this behaviour because pupils cannot simply leave. Adults encountering a rude customer-service worker can complain, walk away, or at least conduct a furious review of the café while drinking their overpriced flat white. Pupils, by contrast, are required to remain in the room, listen to the adult in charge and often depend on that adult for grades, recommendations and support. This imbalance makes an arrogant teacher’s attitude more powerful than an ordinary unpleasant interaction. A careless remark from a teacher can stay with a pupil for years.

    One of the biggest consequences of teacher’s arrogance is the fear of making mistakes. Learning depends on mistakes. Nobody learns to write, calculate, speak a new language or play the trumpet perfectly on the first attempt. In fact, if someone does play the trumpet perfectly on their first attempt, they should probably be investigated by a team of scientists. Mistakes are evidence that a person is attempting something difficult. Yet an arrogant teacher may treat mistakes as proof of stupidity or poor character. Pupils then become more concerned with avoiding embarrassment than with understanding the work.

    When this happens, questions disappear from the classroom. A pupil who has been laughed at for asking for clarification will not ask again. They may copy from a friend, guess, remain silent or decide that the subject is “not for people like me”. The teacher may then interpret the silence as a sign that everyone understands, which is rather like assuming a room is full because nobody has complained about the seating. In reality, the silence may be full of confusion.

    Arrogance also prevents teachers from recognising that pupils learn in different ways and arrive with different circumstances. Some children have quiet places to study, well-stocked bookshelves and adults at home who can help with homework. Others may share bedrooms, care for siblings, struggle with anxiety, have additional learning needs, or be learning English alongside everything else. A teacher who assumes every pupil begins from the same position may mistake disadvantage for laziness. This is not only unfair; it is educationally useless. Telling a pupil to “try harder” is not a strategy if the actual problem is that they do not understand the instructions, cannot access the material, or are too worried to concentrate.

    An arrogant approach often relies on labels. Pupils become “the clever ones”, “the troublemakers”, “the quiet ones”, or “the ones who will never be academic”. Labels are tempting because they make a complicated class feel easier to manage. They are also dangerous because pupils can start behaving according to the role they have been assigned. If a teacher repeatedly treats someone as disruptive, that pupil may conclude that disruption is the only identity available to them. If another pupil is praised only for being naturally bright, they may become afraid of difficult tasks that might reveal they are not effortlessly brilliant after all.

    The idea that intelligence is fixed is particularly harmful. An arrogant teacher may enjoy being seen as the expert and may, perhaps without meaning to, encourage the belief that talent belongs to a select group. But education should teach that skills can grow through practice, feedback and perseverance. A pupil who cannot solve an equation today may be able to solve one next month. A pupil whose first essay resembles a distressed shopping list may eventually write beautifully. Teachers should offer guidance without turning themselves into gatekeepers of who is allowed to succeed.

    Another serious problem is that arrogant teachers model poor behaviour. Young people learn not only from what adults say but from how adults act. A teacher who demands respect while showing none teaches pupils that authority means being obeyed, not being fair. A teacher who refuses to admit a mistake teaches that being wrong is shameful. A teacher who interrupts, mocks or ignores people teaches that power gives permission to behave badly. This is a bleak lesson, and it is one pupils may carry into workplaces, families and public life.

    By contrast, a teacher who says, “I explained that badly; let me try again,” demonstrates maturity. Far from weakening their authority, this usually strengthens it. Pupils tend to respect adults who are knowledgeable but human. There is something reassuring about seeing a teacher correct an error without collapsing into dramatic despair. Nobody expects perfection. They simply want evidence that fairness applies to everyone, including the person with the whiteboard pen.

    Teacher’s arrogance can also harm relationships with parents and colleagues. Education works best when teachers, families and support staff communicate honestly. An arrogant teacher may assume that parents are interfering, that teaching assistants have little to contribute, or that colleagues who suggest a different method are questioning their competence. This can create a defensive atmosphere in which useful information is ignored. A parent may know that a child is coping with a major change at home. A teaching assistant may notice that a pupil understands better when shown a visual example. A colleague may have a practical solution to a recurring problem. None of this is an attack on the teacher. It is part of the shared work of helping children learn.

    There is also a wider issue of trust in education. Teachers are rightly given responsibility because society values education. But authority without accountability can become harmful. Pupils need to know that they can raise concerns and be listened to. Schools need systems that allow feedback without making children feel they are risking punishment. This does not mean that every pupil complaint is automatically correct, or that teachers must turn lessons into a daily referendum. It means that adults should be prepared to reflect on their conduct. Listening is not surrender; it is professional strength.

    It is important to acknowledge that teaching is difficult. Teachers face large classes, paperwork, behaviour issues, limited time and the mysterious disappearance of glue sticks. Stress and exhaustion can make anyone short-tempered. Not every firm instruction or impatient moment is arrogance. Teachers are allowed to have bad days; most people would be slightly frazzled after explaining the same point six times while someone asks whether it will be “on the test”. The concern is a persistent attitude of superiority: the belief that pupils’ feelings, questions and perspectives are beneath consideration.

    Preventing arrogance begins with humility. Humility does not mean pretending not to know things. It means recognising that knowledge brings responsibility. Teachers should be experts in their subjects, but they should also remain learners: learning from research, from colleagues, from parents and from pupils themselves. They can invite questions, welcome constructive feedback and distinguish between challenging poor behaviour and humiliating a child. Schools can support this by encouraging mentoring, training and open conversations about classroom practice rather than treating criticism as a personal insult.

    Pupils, too, should be taught that respect is mutual. They should understand that teachers deserve courtesy and that classrooms need rules. But they should also know that it is reasonable to ask for help, to disagree politely and to expect fair treatment. Education should prepare young people to think, not simply to obey. A classroom where pupils can speak honestly is more likely to produce confident, thoughtful adults than one where silence is mistaken for discipline.

    Ultimately, teacher’s arrogance is a big problem because it wastes potential. It can make bright pupils doubt themselves, struggling pupils give up and quiet pupils disappear into the background. It can turn education into a performance of authority rather than a partnership in learning. The best teachers do not need to prove that they are the cleverest person in the room. Usually, they are too busy helping everyone else become cleverer. That is not weakness. It is the real confidence at the heart of teaching.

    #arrogance #education #learning #schools #teachers #teachersArrogance #teaching #writing
  5. Teacher’s Arrogance: Why Is It A Big Problem?


    Teachers hold an unusual kind of power. They do not merely explain algebra, mark essays, or attempt to persuade thirty teenagers that Shakespeare is more exciting than a bin bag. They influence how young people see knowledge, authority and, crucially, themselves. A good teacher can make a pupil believe they are capable of things they had never imagined. An arrogant teacher can make them believe the opposite, often before the bell has rung for lunch.

    Teacher’s arrogance is a big problem because it damages learning, confidence and trust. It turns a classroom from a place of curiosity into a small court, with one person permanently seated on the throne and everyone else expected to nod respectfully. Of course, teachers need confidence: nobody wants a maths lesson led by someone who introduces fractions with, “I’m fairly sure this is right, but do check the internet.” Confidence and arrogance, however, are not the same thing. Confidence says, “I know this subject and I can help you understand it.” Arrogance says, “I know this subject, therefore I am also wiser than you about everything, including your own experience.” That distinction matters enormously.

    At its simplest, arrogance is an inflated sense of one’s own importance or correctness, often combined with a reluctance to listen. In a teacher, it may appear as dismissing questions, mocking mistakes, refusing to admit errors, treating pupils as naturally lazy, or believing that a qualification automatically makes every decision beyond criticism. It can be loud and obvious: the teacher who humiliates a child for getting an answer wrong. But it can also be quieter: the teacher who never asks for feedback, who assumes a struggling pupil is not trying, or who talks about pupils rather than with them.

    The classroom is especially vulnerable to this behaviour because pupils cannot simply leave. Adults encountering a rude customer-service worker can complain, walk away, or at least conduct a furious review of the café while drinking their overpriced flat white. Pupils, by contrast, are required to remain in the room, listen to the adult in charge and often depend on that adult for grades, recommendations and support. This imbalance makes an arrogant teacher’s attitude more powerful than an ordinary unpleasant interaction. A careless remark from a teacher can stay with a pupil for years.

    One of the biggest consequences of teacher’s arrogance is the fear of making mistakes. Learning depends on mistakes. Nobody learns to write, calculate, speak a new language or play the trumpet perfectly on the first attempt. In fact, if someone does play the trumpet perfectly on their first attempt, they should probably be investigated by a team of scientists. Mistakes are evidence that a person is attempting something difficult. Yet an arrogant teacher may treat mistakes as proof of stupidity or poor character. Pupils then become more concerned with avoiding embarrassment than with understanding the work.

    When this happens, questions disappear from the classroom. A pupil who has been laughed at for asking for clarification will not ask again. They may copy from a friend, guess, remain silent or decide that the subject is “not for people like me”. The teacher may then interpret the silence as a sign that everyone understands, which is rather like assuming a room is full because nobody has complained about the seating. In reality, the silence may be full of confusion.

    Arrogance also prevents teachers from recognising that pupils learn in different ways and arrive with different circumstances. Some children have quiet places to study, well-stocked bookshelves and adults at home who can help with homework. Others may share bedrooms, care for siblings, struggle with anxiety, have additional learning needs, or be learning English alongside everything else. A teacher who assumes every pupil begins from the same position may mistake disadvantage for laziness. This is not only unfair; it is educationally useless. Telling a pupil to “try harder” is not a strategy if the actual problem is that they do not understand the instructions, cannot access the material, or are too worried to concentrate.

    An arrogant approach often relies on labels. Pupils become “the clever ones”, “the troublemakers”, “the quiet ones”, or “the ones who will never be academic”. Labels are tempting because they make a complicated class feel easier to manage. They are also dangerous because pupils can start behaving according to the role they have been assigned. If a teacher repeatedly treats someone as disruptive, that pupil may conclude that disruption is the only identity available to them. If another pupil is praised only for being naturally bright, they may become afraid of difficult tasks that might reveal they are not effortlessly brilliant after all.

    The idea that intelligence is fixed is particularly harmful. An arrogant teacher may enjoy being seen as the expert and may, perhaps without meaning to, encourage the belief that talent belongs to a select group. But education should teach that skills can grow through practice, feedback and perseverance. A pupil who cannot solve an equation today may be able to solve one next month. A pupil whose first essay resembles a distressed shopping list may eventually write beautifully. Teachers should offer guidance without turning themselves into gatekeepers of who is allowed to succeed.

    Another serious problem is that arrogant teachers model poor behaviour. Young people learn not only from what adults say but from how adults act. A teacher who demands respect while showing none teaches pupils that authority means being obeyed, not being fair. A teacher who refuses to admit a mistake teaches that being wrong is shameful. A teacher who interrupts, mocks or ignores people teaches that power gives permission to behave badly. This is a bleak lesson, and it is one pupils may carry into workplaces, families and public life.

    By contrast, a teacher who says, “I explained that badly; let me try again,” demonstrates maturity. Far from weakening their authority, this usually strengthens it. Pupils tend to respect adults who are knowledgeable but human. There is something reassuring about seeing a teacher correct an error without collapsing into dramatic despair. Nobody expects perfection. They simply want evidence that fairness applies to everyone, including the person with the whiteboard pen.

    Teacher’s arrogance can also harm relationships with parents and colleagues. Education works best when teachers, families and support staff communicate honestly. An arrogant teacher may assume that parents are interfering, that teaching assistants have little to contribute, or that colleagues who suggest a different method are questioning their competence. This can create a defensive atmosphere in which useful information is ignored. A parent may know that a child is coping with a major change at home. A teaching assistant may notice that a pupil understands better when shown a visual example. A colleague may have a practical solution to a recurring problem. None of this is an attack on the teacher. It is part of the shared work of helping children learn.

    There is also a wider issue of trust in education. Teachers are rightly given responsibility because society values education. But authority without accountability can become harmful. Pupils need to know that they can raise concerns and be listened to. Schools need systems that allow feedback without making children feel they are risking punishment. This does not mean that every pupil complaint is automatically correct, or that teachers must turn lessons into a daily referendum. It means that adults should be prepared to reflect on their conduct. Listening is not surrender; it is professional strength.

    It is important to acknowledge that teaching is difficult. Teachers face large classes, paperwork, behaviour issues, limited time and the mysterious disappearance of glue sticks. Stress and exhaustion can make anyone short-tempered. Not every firm instruction or impatient moment is arrogance. Teachers are allowed to have bad days; most people would be slightly frazzled after explaining the same point six times while someone asks whether it will be “on the test”. The concern is a persistent attitude of superiority: the belief that pupils’ feelings, questions and perspectives are beneath consideration.

    Preventing arrogance begins with humility. Humility does not mean pretending not to know things. It means recognising that knowledge brings responsibility. Teachers should be experts in their subjects, but they should also remain learners: learning from research, from colleagues, from parents and from pupils themselves. They can invite questions, welcome constructive feedback and distinguish between challenging poor behaviour and humiliating a child. Schools can support this by encouraging mentoring, training and open conversations about classroom practice rather than treating criticism as a personal insult.

    Pupils, too, should be taught that respect is mutual. They should understand that teachers deserve courtesy and that classrooms need rules. But they should also know that it is reasonable to ask for help, to disagree politely and to expect fair treatment. Education should prepare young people to think, not simply to obey. A classroom where pupils can speak honestly is more likely to produce confident, thoughtful adults than one where silence is mistaken for discipline.

    Ultimately, teacher’s arrogance is a big problem because it wastes potential. It can make bright pupils doubt themselves, struggling pupils give up and quiet pupils disappear into the background. It can turn education into a performance of authority rather than a partnership in learning. The best teachers do not need to prove that they are the cleverest person in the room. Usually, they are too busy helping everyone else become cleverer. That is not weakness. It is the real confidence at the heart of teaching.

    #arrogance #education #learning #schools #teachers #teachersArrogance #teaching #writing
  6. Private interests, or: Public voice

    An Interlocking Rubáiyát

    He let Qatari money flow,
    Let Hamas arm itself below;
    They breached the border—his neglect!
    The response? His old blame-game show.
    
    And what did Bibi first protect
    With every charge that he’d deflect?
    He kept his own role out of view—
    Truth? State inquiry? He rejects!
    
    He swore victory to pursue,
    His “clear objectives”? None came through;
    Captives abandoned; loved ones grieved—
    The promised rescue? Long past due.
    
    While reserve soldiers felt aggrieved
    At what those exempted received, 
    Our people split by creed and rule—
    His power bargain was achieved.
    
    He let the sharks into the pool,
    Then made himself their useful tool;
    The courts became their next great wall—
    Now, who's the master, who's the fool?
    
    He pressed to make the guardrails fall,
    To force the courts to heed his call;
    His trial hanging over him—
    Who benefits when justice stalls?
    
    With charges closing in on him,
    The public's trust grew ever dim;
    Private interests; public voice—
    The country's situation? Grim.
    
    His survival? There was no choice!
    Rewarded acolytes rejoiced—
    Who cares how much the people owe?
    But—might October end their ploys?

    W3 poetry prompt

    For W3, Val invites us to write a 4–8 stanza interlocking rubáiyát that humorously or critically roasts a person in power. Each stanza has four 8-syllable lines, with linked rhymes following the pattern AABA / BBCB / CCDC / DDED, and so on.

    Let’s write poetry together!

    When it comes to partnership, some humans can make their lives alone – it’s possible. But creatively, it’s more like painting: you can’t just use the same colours in every painting. It’s just not an option. You can’t take the same photograph every time and live with art forms with no differences.

    Ben Harper (b. 1969)

    Would you like to create poetry with me and have a completed poem of yours featured here at the Skeptic’s Kaddish? I am very excited to have launched the ‘Poetry Partners’ initiative and am looking forward to meeting and creating with you… Check it out!

    #Arrogance #BenjaminNetanyahu #BibiNetanyahu #Corruption #InterlockingRubáiyát #Israel #Netanyahu #Poem #Poetry #Politics
  7. Private interests, or: Public voice

    An Interlocking Rubáiyát

    He let Qatari money flow,
    Let Hamas arm itself below;
    They breached the border—his neglect!
    The response? His old blame-game show.
    
    And what did Bibi first protect
    With every charge that he’d deflect?
    He kept his own role out of view—
    Truth? State inquiry? He rejects!
    
    He swore victory to pursue,
    His “clear objectives”? None came through;
    Captives abandoned; loved ones grieved—
    The promised rescue? Long past due.
    
    While reserve soldiers felt aggrieved
    At what those exempted received, 
    Our people split by creed and rule—
    His power bargain was achieved.
    
    He let the sharks into the pool,
    Then made himself their useful tool;
    The courts became their next great wall—
    Now, who's the master, who's the fool?
    
    He pressed to make the guardrails fall,
    To force the courts to heed his call;
    His trial hanging over him—
    Who benefits when justice stalls?
    
    With charges closing in on him,
    The public's trust grew ever dim;
    Private interests; public voice—
    The country's situation? Grim.
    
    His survival? There was no choice!
    Rewarded acolytes rejoiced—
    Who cares how much the people owe?
    But—might October end their ploys?

    W3 poetry prompt

    For W3, Val invites us to write a 4–8 stanza interlocking rubáiyát that humorously or critically roasts a person in power. Each stanza has four 8-syllable lines, with linked rhymes following the pattern AABA / BBCB / CCDC / DDED, and so on.

    Let’s write poetry together!

    When it comes to partnership, some humans can make their lives alone – it’s possible. But creatively, it’s more like painting: you can’t just use the same colours in every painting. It’s just not an option. You can’t take the same photograph every time and live with art forms with no differences.

    Ben Harper (b. 1969)

    Would you like to create poetry with me and have a completed poem of yours featured here at the Skeptic’s Kaddish? I am very excited to have launched the ‘Poetry Partners’ initiative and am looking forward to meeting and creating with you… Check it out!

    #Arrogance #BenjaminNetanyahu #BibiNetanyahu #Corruption #InterlockingRubáiyát #Israel #Netanyahu #Poem #Poetry #Politics
  8. Private interests, or: Public voice

    An Interlocking Rubáiyát

    He let Qatari money flow,
    Let Hamas arm itself below;
    They breached the border—his neglect!
    The response? His old blame-game show.
    
    And what did Bibi first protect
    With every charge that he’d deflect?
    He kept his own role out of view—
    Truth? State inquiry? He rejects!
    
    He swore victory to pursue,
    His “clear objectives”? None came through;
    Captives abandoned; loved ones grieved—
    The promised rescue? Long past due.
    
    While reserve soldiers felt aggrieved
    At what those exempted received, 
    Our people split by creed and rule—
    His power bargain was achieved.
    
    He let the sharks into the pool,
    Then made himself their useful tool;
    The courts became their next great wall—
    Now, who's the master, who's the fool?
    
    He pressed to make the guardrails fall,
    To force the courts to heed his call;
    His trial hanging over him—
    Who benefits when justice stalls?
    
    With charges closing in on him,
    The public's trust grew ever dim;
    Private interests; public voice—
    The country's situation? Grim.
    
    His survival? There was no choice!
    Rewarded acolytes rejoiced—
    Who cares how much the people owe?
    But—might October end their ploys?

    W3 poetry prompt

    For W3, Val invites us to write a 4–8 stanza interlocking rubáiyát that humorously or critically roasts a person in power. Each stanza has four 8-syllable lines, with linked rhymes following the pattern AABA / BBCB / CCDC / DDED, and so on.

    Let’s write poetry together!

    When it comes to partnership, some humans can make their lives alone – it’s possible. But creatively, it’s more like painting: you can’t just use the same colours in every painting. It’s just not an option. You can’t take the same photograph every time and live with art forms with no differences.

    Ben Harper (b. 1969)

    Would you like to create poetry with me and have a completed poem of yours featured here at the Skeptic’s Kaddish? I am very excited to have launched the ‘Poetry Partners’ initiative and am looking forward to meeting and creating with you… Check it out!

    #Arrogance #BenjaminNetanyahu #BibiNetanyahu #Corruption #InterlockingRubáiyát #Israel #Netanyahu #Poem #Poetry #Politics
  9. Private interests, or: Public voice

    An Interlocking Rubáiyát

    He let Qatari money flow,
    Let Hamas arm itself below;
    They breached the border—his neglect!
    The response? His old blame-game show.
    
    And what did Bibi first protect
    With every charge that he’d deflect?
    He kept his own role out of view—
    Truth? State inquiry? He rejects!
    
    He swore victory to pursue,
    His “clear objectives”? None came through;
    Captives abandoned; loved ones grieved—
    The promised rescue? Long past due.
    
    While reserve soldiers felt aggrieved
    At what those exempted received, 
    Our people split by creed and rule—
    His power bargain was achieved.
    
    He let the sharks into the pool,
    Then made himself their useful tool;
    The courts became their next great wall—
    Now, who's the master, who's the fool?
    
    He pressed to make the guardrails fall,
    To force the courts to heed his call;
    His trial hanging over him—
    Who benefits when justice stalls?
    
    With charges closing in on him,
    The public's trust grew ever dim;
    Private interests; public voice—
    The country's situation? Grim.
    
    His survival? There was no choice!
    Rewarded acolytes rejoiced—
    Who cares how much the people owe?
    But—might October end their ploys?

    W3 poetry prompt

    For W3, Val invites us to write a 4–8 stanza interlocking rubáiyát that humorously or critically roasts a person in power. Each stanza has four 8-syllable lines, with linked rhymes following the pattern AABA / BBCB / CCDC / DDED, and so on.

    Let’s write poetry together!

    When it comes to partnership, some humans can make their lives alone – it’s possible. But creatively, it’s more like painting: you can’t just use the same colours in every painting. It’s just not an option. You can’t take the same photograph every time and live with art forms with no differences.

    Ben Harper (b. 1969)

    Would you like to create poetry with me and have a completed poem of yours featured here at the Skeptic’s Kaddish? I am very excited to have launched the ‘Poetry Partners’ initiative and am looking forward to meeting and creating with you… Check it out!

    #Arrogance #BenjaminNetanyahu #BibiNetanyahu #Corruption #InterlockingRubáiyát #Israel #Netanyahu #Poem #Poetry #Politics
  10. @JugglingWithEggs
    What arrogance! Palantir takes the benefits and avoids the costs; not exactly the behaviour of a good corporate citizen. Perhaps the expectations for their behaviour weren’t well explained to them? 🤔
    (Ha ha, I will have my little joke… 🤡)

    #UKPol #arrogance #notTheBehaviourOfAGoodCorporateCitizen #behaviouralExpectationsNotExplainedPerhaps #littleJoke

  11. @JugglingWithEggs
    What arrogance! Palantir takes the benefits and avoids the costs; not exactly the behaviour of a good corporate citizen. Perhaps the expectations for their behaviour weren’t well explained to them? 🤔
    (Ha ha, I will have my little joke… 🤡)

    #UKPol #arrogance #notTheBehaviourOfAGoodCorporateCitizen #behaviouralExpectationsNotExplainedPerhaps #littleJoke

  12. @JugglingWithEggs
    What arrogance! Palantir takes the benefits and avoids the costs; not exactly the behaviour of a good corporate citizen. Perhaps the expectations for their behaviour weren’t well explained to them? 🤔
    (Ha ha, I will have my little joke… 🤡)

    #UKPol #arrogance #notTheBehaviourOfAGoodCorporateCitizen #behaviouralExpectationsNotExplainedPerhaps #littleJoke

  13. @JugglingWithEggs
    What arrogance! Palantir takes the benefits and avoids the costs; not exactly the behaviour of a good corporate citizen. Perhaps the expectations for their behaviour weren’t well explained to them? 🤔
    (Ha ha, I will have my little joke… 🤡)

    #UKPol #arrogance #notTheBehaviourOfAGoodCorporateCitizen #behaviouralExpectationsNotExplainedPerhaps #littleJoke

  14. @JugglingWithEggs
    What arrogance! Palantir takes the benefits and avoids the costs; not exactly the behaviour of a good corporate citizen. Perhaps the expectations for their behaviour weren’t well explained to them? 🤔
    (Ha ha, I will have my little joke… 🤡)

    #UKPol #arrogance #notTheBehaviourOfAGoodCorporateCitizen #behaviouralExpectationsNotExplainedPerhaps #littleJoke

  15. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    ERR, v.i. To believe or act in a way contrary to my beliefs and actions.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Err,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1884-05-24)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/85250…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #arrogance #belief #disagreement #ego #error #perspective #presumption #rightandwrong #selfrighteousness

  16. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    ERR, v.i. To believe or act in a way contrary to my beliefs and actions.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Err,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1884-05-24)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/85250…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #arrogance #belief #disagreement #ego #error #perspective #presumption #rightandwrong #selfrighteousness

  17. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    ERR, v.i. To believe or act in a way contrary to my beliefs and actions.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Err,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1884-05-24)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/85250…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #arrogance #belief #disagreement #ego #error #perspective #presumption #rightandwrong #selfrighteousness

  18. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    ERR, v.i. To believe or act in a way contrary to my beliefs and actions.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Err,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1884-05-24)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/85250…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #arrogance #belief #disagreement #ego #error #perspective #presumption #rightandwrong #selfrighteousness

  19. After Elon #Musk called an editor who is also a great journalist: "A traitor to the West,"
    Chef Jose Andres wrote: "Elon drink a glass of water before you tweet. You may build rockets and satellites and cars and anything else you want, and we thank you! But you can not call a great journalist that actually ask you good questions an enemy to humanity! You sound and act like a tyrant. Change!"
    #arrogance #recklessness #PoorJudgment

  20. After Elon #Musk called an editor who is also a great journalist: "A traitor to the West,"
    Chef Jose Andres wrote: "Elon drink a glass of water before you tweet. You may build rockets and satellites and cars and anything else you want, and we thank you! But you can not call a great journalist that actually ask you good questions an enemy to humanity! You sound and act like a tyrant. Change!"
    #arrogance #recklessness #PoorJudgment

  21. After Elon #Musk called an editor who is also a great journalist: "A traitor to the West,"
    Chef Jose Andres wrote: "Elon drink a glass of water before you tweet. You may build rockets and satellites and cars and anything else you want, and we thank you! But you can not call a great journalist that actually ask you good questions an enemy to humanity! You sound and act like a tyrant. Change!"
    #arrogance #recklessness #PoorJudgment

  22. After Elon #Musk called an editor who is also a great journalist: "A traitor to the West,"
    Chef Jose Andres wrote: "Elon drink a glass of water before you tweet. You may build rockets and satellites and cars and anything else you want, and we thank you! But you can not call a great journalist that actually ask you good questions an enemy to humanity! You sound and act like a tyrant. Change!"
    #arrogance #recklessness #PoorJudgment

  23. Interesting. "Power changes people."

    "I'm not a fan of total #AI control, but there has to be a safeguard against #ego, .. #arrogance, .. #narcissism, and #sycophancy.", @BohdanKrotevych

    AI may be offer this safeguard. This could and should be a goal.

    youtube.com/watch?v=27KXmRxB1S

  24. Interesting. "Power changes people."

    "I'm not a fan of total #AI control, but there has to be a safeguard against #ego, .. #arrogance, .. #narcissism, and #sycophancy.", @BohdanKrotevych

    AI may be offer this safeguard. This could and should be a goal.

    youtube.com/watch?v=27KXmRxB1S

  25. Interesting. "Power changes people."

    "I'm not a fan of total #AI control, but there has to be a safeguard against #ego, .. #arrogance, .. #narcissism, and #sycophancy.", @BohdanKrotevych

    AI may be offer this safeguard. This could and should be a goal.

    youtube.com/watch?v=27KXmRxB1S

  26. Interesting. "Power changes people."

    "I'm not a fan of total #AI control, but there has to be a safeguard against #ego, .. #arrogance, .. #narcissism, and #sycophancy.", @BohdanKrotevych

    AI may be offer this safeguard. This could and should be a goal.

    youtube.com/watch?v=27KXmRxB1S

  27. Interesting. "Power changes people."

    "I'm not a fan of total #AI control, but there has to be a safeguard against #ego, .. #arrogance, .. #narcissism, and #sycophancy.", @BohdanKrotevych

    AI may be offer this safeguard. This could and should be a goal.

    youtube.com/watch?v=27KXmRxB1S

  28. 安かれ悪かれ 不管是好是坏
    品質が悪くとも、安かれば良い。
    即使质量不好,如果能便宜点就更好了。

    note.com/poison_raika/n/nccc0d

    <>

    #reality #world #evil #bad #services #better #only #products #quality #greed #mentality #worse #arrogance #cheaper

  29. 安かれ悪かれ 不管是好是坏
    品質が悪くとも、安かれば良い。
    即使质量不好,如果能便宜点就更好了。

    note.com/poison_raika/n/nccc0d

    <>

    #reality #world #evil #bad #services #better #only #products #quality #greed #mentality #worse #arrogance #cheaper

  30. 安かれ悪かれ 不管是好是坏
    品質が悪くとも、安かれば良い。
    即使质量不好,如果能便宜点就更好了。

    note.com/poison_raika/n/nccc0d

    <>

    #reality #world #evil #bad #services #better #only #products #quality #greed #mentality #worse #arrogance #cheaper

  31. I am not going to watch, I just hope Spain wins, and I have bought some yarn from the Falklands.
    In The Guardian:
    ‘Rifts began to appear’: Why many Latin Americans want Spain to beat Argentina in the World Cup final

    A history of racism and ongoing footballing rivalries have made the choice of which team to get behind in Sunday’s final a charged topic

    theguardian.com/football/2026/

    #football #racism #arrogance #schadenfreude #Spain

  32. I am not going to watch, I just hope Spain wins, and I have bought some yarn from the Falklands.
    In The Guardian:
    ‘Rifts began to appear’: Why many Latin Americans want Spain to beat Argentina in the World Cup final

    A history of racism and ongoing footballing rivalries have made the choice of which team to get behind in Sunday’s final a charged topic

    theguardian.com/football/2026/

    #football #racism #arrogance #schadenfreude #Spain

  33. I am not going to watch, I just hope Spain wins, and I have bought some yarn from the Falklands.
    In The Guardian:
    ‘Rifts began to appear’: Why many Latin Americans want Spain to beat Argentina in the World Cup final

    A history of racism and ongoing footballing rivalries have made the choice of which team to get behind in Sunday’s final a charged topic

    theguardian.com/football/2026/

    #football #racism #arrogance #schadenfreude #Spain

  34. I am not going to watch, I just hope Spain wins, and I have bought some yarn from the Falklands.
    In The Guardian:
    ‘Rifts began to appear’: Why many Latin Americans want Spain to beat Argentina in the World Cup final

    A history of racism and ongoing footballing rivalries have made the choice of which team to get behind in Sunday’s final a charged topic

    theguardian.com/football/2026/

    #football #racism #arrogance #schadenfreude #Spain

  35. Krystal and Saagar discuss the looming oil crisis amid the Iran war and Israel's plot to recruit a former Iranian leader as an intelligence asset.

    #Iran #oil #GOPLiesAboutEverything #hubris #arrogance #GasLines

    youtube.com/watch?v=1kjK...

    OIL CATASTROPHE Looms As Trump...

  36. Krystal and Saagar discuss the looming oil crisis amid the Iran war and Israel's plot to recruit a former Iranian leader as an intelligence asset.

    #Iran #oil #GOPLiesAboutEverything #hubris #arrogance #GasLines

    youtube.com/watch?v=1kjK...

    OIL CATASTROPHE Looms As Trump...

  37. stewartstaffordblog @stewartstaffordblog.wordpress.com@stewartstaffordblog.wordpress.com ·

    The Lowest Bid


    The Lowest Bid by Stewart Stafford

    The sceptre is cast to the shivering sea
    with divine ordinance, codes of chivalry.
    A blinding vision of the fallen from on high,
    New roving dregs with a scavenger’s eye.

    Yield up the light, coax out the dying flame,
    Punishment for crimes revokes your name.
    Was freedom built on ancient delusion?
    It persists as the architect’s cold conclusion.

    The most degrading and painful descent
    is the one to the lower “kingdom” crescent,
    Shadow throne invoked by seditious implication.
    Collusion not coercion, mummified by mediation.

    Trust not the expedient offer, the beatific start —
    They can only embalm the chasms of the heart.

    © 2026 Stewart Stafford. All rights reserved.

    #Angel #Angels #Anger #Arrogance #DarkFantasy #DarkPoetry #Defiance #Devil #FallenAngels #God #Hades #Hell #Hubris #Lucifer #Milton #Nephilim #ParadiseLost #Poem #poems #Poetry #Pride #Prophecy #Prophetic #Satan #StewartStaffordPoems #TheFallen #War #WarInHeaven
  38. stewartstaffordblog @stewartstaffordblog.wordpress.com@stewartstaffordblog.wordpress.com ·

    The Lowest Bid


    The Lowest Bid by Stewart Stafford

    The sceptre is cast to the shivering sea
    with divine ordinance, codes of chivalry.
    A blinding vision of the fallen from on high,
    New roving dregs with a scavenger’s eye.

    Yield up the light, coax out the dying flame,
    Punishment for crimes revokes your name.
    Was freedom built on ancient delusion?
    It persists as the architect’s cold conclusion.

    The most degrading and painful descent
    is the one to the lower “kingdom” crescent,
    Shadow throne invoked by seditious implication.
    Collusion not coercion, mummified by mediation.

    Trust not the expedient offer, the beatific start —
    They can only embalm the chasms of the heart.

    © 2026 Stewart Stafford. All rights reserved.

    #Angel #Angels #Anger #Arrogance #DarkFantasy #DarkPoetry #Defiance #Devil #FallenAngels #God #Hades #Hell #Hubris #Lucifer #Milton #Nephilim #ParadiseLost #Poem #poems #Poetry #Pride #Prophecy #Prophetic #Satan #StewartStaffordPoems #TheFallen #War #WarInHeaven
  39. stewartstaffordblog @stewartstaffordblog.wordpress.com@stewartstaffordblog.wordpress.com ·

    The Lowest Bid


    The Lowest Bid by Stewart Stafford

    The sceptre is cast to the shivering sea
    with divine ordinance, codes of chivalry.
    A blinding vision of the fallen from on high,
    New roving dregs with a scavenger’s eye.

    Yield up the light, coax out the dying flame,
    Punishment for crimes revokes your name.
    Was freedom built on ancient delusion?
    It persists as the architect’s cold conclusion.

    The most degrading and painful descent
    is the one to the lower “kingdom” crescent,
    Shadow throne invoked by seditious implication.
    Collusion not coercion, mummified by mediation.

    Trust not the expedient offer, the beatific start —
    They can only embalm the chasms of the heart.

    © 2026 Stewart Stafford. All rights reserved.

    #Angel #Angels #Anger #Arrogance #DarkFantasy #DarkPoetry #Defiance #Devil #FallenAngels #God #Hades #Hell #Hubris #Lucifer #Milton #Nephilim #ParadiseLost #Poem #poems #Poetry #Pride #Prophecy #Prophetic #Satan #StewartStaffordPoems #TheFallen #War #WarInHeaven
  40. stewartstaffordblog @stewartstaffordblog.wordpress.com@stewartstaffordblog.wordpress.com ·

    The Lowest Bid


    The Lowest Bid by Stewart Stafford

    The sceptre is cast to the shivering sea
    with divine ordinance, codes of chivalry.
    A blinding vision of the fallen from on high,
    New roving dregs with a scavenger’s eye.

    Yield up the light, coax out the dying flame,
    Punishment for crimes revokes your name.
    Was freedom built on ancient delusion?
    It persists as the architect’s cold conclusion.

    The most degrading and painful descent
    is the one to the lower “kingdom” crescent,
    Shadow throne invoked by seditious implication.
    Collusion not coercion, mummified by mediation.

    Trust not the expedient offer, the beatific start —
    They can only embalm the chasms of the heart.

    © 2026 Stewart Stafford. All rights reserved.

    #Angel #Angels #Anger #Arrogance #DarkFantasy #DarkPoetry #Defiance #Devil #FallenAngels #God #Hades #Hell #Hubris #Lucifer #Milton #Nephilim #ParadiseLost #Poem #poems #Poetry #Pride #Prophecy #Prophetic #Satan #StewartStaffordPoems #TheFallen #War #WarInHeaven
  41. stewartstaffordblog @stewartstaffordblog.wordpress.com@stewartstaffordblog.wordpress.com ·

    The Lowest Bid


    The Lowest Bid by Stewart Stafford

    The sceptre is cast to the shivering sea
    with divine ordinance, codes of chivalry.
    A blinding vision of the fallen from on high,
    New roving dregs with a scavenger’s eye.

    Yield up the light, coax out the dying flame,
    Punishment for crimes revokes your name.
    Was freedom built on ancient delusion?
    It persists as the architect’s cold conclusion.

    The most degrading and painful descent
    is the one to the lower “kingdom” crescent,
    Shadow throne invoked by seditious implication.
    Collusion not coercion, mummified by mediation.

    Trust not the expedient offer, the beatific start —
    They can only embalm the chasms of the heart.

    © 2026 Stewart Stafford. All rights reserved.

    #Angel #Angels #Anger #Arrogance #DarkFantasy #DarkPoetry #Defiance #Devil #FallenAngels #God #Hades #Hell #Hubris #Lucifer #Milton #Nephilim #ParadiseLost #Poem #poems #Poetry #Pride #Prophecy #Prophetic #Satan #StewartStaffordPoems #TheFallen #War #WarInHeaven
  42. RE: mastodon.social/@RonSupportsYo

    "Jeff Bezos was one of the major funders of Barack Obama’s presidential center ... But Bezos grew frustrated with the Biden administration, which, as many other tech CEOs did, he viewed as antibusiness. Bezos was largely shunned by the Biden White House."

    This is one of many ways that Joe Biden stupidly helped the Republican Party.
    “Biden stiff-armed the entire Fortune 100, rarely engaging with business leaders.”
    #Biden #arrogance #HowToLoseElections #politics

  43. RE: mastodon.social/@RonSupportsYo

    "Jeff Bezos was one of the major funders of Barack Obama’s presidential center ... But Bezos grew frustrated with the Biden administration, which, as many other tech CEOs did, he viewed as antibusiness. Bezos was largely shunned by the Biden White House."

    This is one of many ways that Joe Biden stupidly helped the Republican Party.
    “Biden stiff-armed the entire Fortune 100, rarely engaging with business leaders.”
    #Biden #arrogance #HowToLoseElections #politics

  44. RE: mastodon.social/@RonSupportsYo

    "Jeff Bezos was one of the major funders of Barack Obama’s presidential center ... But Bezos grew frustrated with the Biden administration, which, as many other tech CEOs did, he viewed as antibusiness. Bezos was largely shunned by the Biden White House."

    This is one of many ways that Joe Biden stupidly helped the Republican Party.
    “Biden stiff-armed the entire Fortune 100, rarely engaging with business leaders.”
    #Biden #arrogance #HowToLoseElections #politics

  45. RE: mastodon.social/@RonSupportsYo

    "Jeff Bezos was one of the major funders of Barack Obama’s presidential center ... But Bezos grew frustrated with the Biden administration, which, as many other tech CEOs did, he viewed as antibusiness. Bezos was largely shunned by the Biden White House."

    This is one of many ways that Joe Biden stupidly helped the Republican Party.
    “Biden stiff-armed the entire Fortune 100, rarely engaging with business leaders.”
    #Biden #arrogance #HowToLoseElections #politics

  46. ‘Degrading’: why did a US fighter pilot avoid British trial after strangling a woman in England?

    Events i Japan and Anne Sacoolas mowing down Harry Dunn, 2019 also spring to mind #impunity #arrogance #lawlessness

    www.theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-i...

    ‘Degrading’: why did a US figh...