#aisoftheblind — Public Fediverse posts

Now I'm pondering on how to demonstrate the differences between an AI-generated image description and my hand-made one for the same picture.

Should I do it in a post that federates, even though it'll definitely exceed 500 characters by magnitudes? Or should I do it in an article and then link to the article? I'm afraid Mastodon users won't read it either way, but this can't be done in 500 characters or less, unless I made it a massive thread.

Should I include my own description in the post, or should I link to it? Both would be inconvenient. And I'm talking about descriptions of 25,000 to 40,000 characters, by the way. Each of them. For one image each.

But if I included the image itself, I would have to give a full, detailed description, so I would have to include my own description at its full extent. Another reason why this can't be done in 500 characters or less.

Should I dissect the AI-generated description, review it bit by bit and point out missing, inaccurate and out-right false information?

#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #AI #AIsOfTheBlind #ImageDescription #ImageDescriptions #ImageDescriptionMeta #CWImageDescriptionMeta

To all of you who think that AI is perfectly capable of describing any picture at high details in such a way that everyone will get both the image and the description:

Let me see your precious AI write a more detailed, more accurate, more competent, more explanatory description for this picture than THIS. (@Mastodon users: There is a 25,000+-character image description in the parent post.)

#AltText #ImageDescription #ImageDescriptionMeta #CWImageDescriptionMeta #AI #AIsOfTheBlind