#admissibility — Public Fediverse posts

Geospatial Data As Bioethical Evidence
--
https://doi.org/10.4401/jgsg-111 <-- shared paper
--
https://theconversation.com/gaza-we-analysed-a-year-of-satellite-images-to-map-the-scale-of-agricultural-destruction-248796 <-- shared technical article
--
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/inside-the-satellite-tech-revealing-gazas-destruction/ <-- shared 2023 technical article
--
“Satellite imagery now documents systematic patterns of infrastructure destruction at spatial resolutions and temporal cadences that were unavailable during the atrocities of the twentieth century. Whether and how such data may enter bioethical deliberation, however, remains under-theorized. Quantitative remote sensing produces damage percentages, not normative claims, and bridging the two without committing an is-ought fallacy requires an explicit epistemological procedure. The contribution developed here is normative and epistemological rather than empirical. A six-component admissibility framework integrates, for the first time, geospatial evidence, population-level bioethical principlism, and the coherentist verification epistemology of political fact-checking into a single reproducible procedure for the bioethical use of satellite imagery. The first component specifies evidence admissibility criteria tailored to bioethical rather than strictly legal use. The second requires coherentist triangulation across methodologically independent remote sensing studies. The third operates as a bioethical relevance filter mapping infrastructure categories onto population-level social determinants of health. The fourth operationalizes principlism by translating health justice, accountability, solidarity, and sustainability into measurable geospatial observables. The fifth establishes ethical representation safeguards against voyeuristic or dehumanizing uses of destruction imagery. The sixth demands explicit epistemic humility regarding uncertainty, data missingness, and attribution limits. The Gaza conflict provides the case in point. Two independently produced geospatial studies, one based on SAR coherent change detection and one on very-high-resolution optical analysis, converge on extensive damage to civilian healthcare, water, sanitation, and educational infrastructure, and thereby satisfy the coherentist triangulation requirement of the framework. The resulting inference licenses bioethical claims of systematic survival infrastructure degradation while preserving transparent boundaries between what satellite evidence can and cannot establish about genocidal intent…”
#geoethics #GIS #spatial #mapping #remotesensing #earthobservation #imagery #satellite #opendata #conflict #war #military #destruction #infrastructure #spatiotemporal #bioethical #evidence #damagepercentages #spatialanalysis #change #quantitative #metrics #normative #epistemological #admissibility #framework #factchecking #controlled #publicsafety #publichealth #healthjustice #geospatialobservables #observation #uncertainty #controls #boundaries #changedetection #coherentisttriangulation #example #gaza

Geospatial Data As Bioethical Evidence
--
https://doi.org/10.4401/jgsg-111 <-- shared paper
--
https://theconversation.com/gaza-we-analysed-a-year-of-satellite-images-to-map-the-scale-of-agricultural-destruction-248796 <-- shared technical article
--
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/inside-the-satellite-tech-revealing-gazas-destruction/ <-- shared 2023 technical article
--
“Satellite imagery now documents systematic patterns of infrastructure destruction at spatial resolutions and temporal cadences that were unavailable during the atrocities of the twentieth century. Whether and how such data may enter bioethical deliberation, however, remains under-theorized. Quantitative remote sensing produces damage percentages, not normative claims, and bridging the two without committing an is-ought fallacy requires an explicit epistemological procedure. The contribution developed here is normative and epistemological rather than empirical. A six-component admissibility framework integrates, for the first time, geospatial evidence, population-level bioethical principlism, and the coherentist verification epistemology of political fact-checking into a single reproducible procedure for the bioethical use of satellite imagery. The first component specifies evidence admissibility criteria tailored to bioethical rather than strictly legal use. The second requires coherentist triangulation across methodologically independent remote sensing studies. The third operates as a bioethical relevance filter mapping infrastructure categories onto population-level social determinants of health. The fourth operationalizes principlism by translating health justice, accountability, solidarity, and sustainability into measurable geospatial observables. The fifth establishes ethical representation safeguards against voyeuristic or dehumanizing uses of destruction imagery. The sixth demands explicit epistemic humility regarding uncertainty, data missingness, and attribution limits. The Gaza conflict provides the case in point. Two independently produced geospatial studies, one based on SAR coherent change detection and one on very-high-resolution optical analysis, converge on extensive damage to civilian healthcare, water, sanitation, and educational infrastructure, and thereby satisfy the coherentist triangulation requirement of the framework. The resulting inference licenses bioethical claims of systematic survival infrastructure degradation while preserving transparent boundaries between what satellite evidence can and cannot establish about genocidal intent…”
#geoethics #GIS #spatial #mapping #remotesensing #earthobservation #imagery #satellite #opendata #conflict #war #military #destruction #infrastructure #spatiotemporal #bioethical #evidence #damagepercentages #spatialanalysis #change #quantitative #metrics #normative #epistemological #admissibility #framework #factchecking #controlled #publicsafety #publichealth #healthjustice #geospatialobservables #observation #uncertainty #controls #boundaries #changedetection #coherentisttriangulation #example #gaza

Master Index

A guided map across physics, biology, engineering, and AI—built around a simple idea

Persistence is not generated, but permitted.

Systems don’t fail because they “break.”

They fail because their boundaries were misclassified.

Core structure
state → constraint → resolution → persistence

From: - Titanic / Vasa / Challenger
– biological regulation
– AI hallucination & drift
– institutional collapse

Same pattern
only admissible states persist

This is the interface.
Start anywhere. Follow the path that fits.

#HybridMind42 #BoundaryDynamics #BoundaryArchitecture #BFPF #HQP
#Admissibility #ConstraintResolution #StateTransition #Persistence
#ComplexSystems #SystemsThinking #StructuralAnalysis #FailureAnalysis
#Physics #QuantumMechanics #Relativity #Lindblad #CPTP #Decoherence
#Biology #Physiology #Adaptation #Homeostasis
#ArtificialIntelligence #AI #LLM #AIAlignment #AIGovernance
#InstitutionalFailure #DecisionMaking
#Emergence #ScientificClarity

https://substack.com/@hybridmind42/note/c-252017333?r=75c2ac

Master Index

A guided map across physics, biology, engineering, and AI—built around a simple idea

Persistence is not generated, but permitted.

Systems don’t fail because they “break.”

They fail because their boundaries were misclassified.

Core structure
state → constraint → resolution → persistence

From: - Titanic / Vasa / Challenger
– biological regulation
– AI hallucination & drift
– institutional collapse

Same pattern
only admissible states persist

This is the interface.
Start anywhere. Follow the path that fits.

#HybridMind42 #BoundaryDynamics #BoundaryArchitecture #BFPF #HQP
#Admissibility #ConstraintResolution #StateTransition #Persistence
#ComplexSystems #SystemsThinking #StructuralAnalysis #FailureAnalysis
#Physics #QuantumMechanics #Relativity #Lindblad #CPTP #Decoherence
#Biology #Physiology #Adaptation #Homeostasis
#ArtificialIntelligence #AI #LLM #AIAlignment #AIGovernance
#InstitutionalFailure #DecisionMaking
#Emergence #ScientificClarity

https://substack.com/@hybridmind42/note/c-252017333?r=75c2ac

https://www.alojapan.com/1318568/japanese-mizuho-bank-escapes-race-bias-suit-from-us-executive/ Japanese Mizuho Bank Escapes Race Bias Suit From US Executive #AccommodationOfDisability #admissibility #EmployerRetaliation #InternationalBanking #Japan #JapanNews #Japanese #JapaneseNews #news #PromotionOfEmployee #RaceDiscrimination Mizuho Bank Ltd. beat a suit Wednesday brought by a former US-based vice president accusing the bank of discrimination against non-Japanese employees and retaliation against him for requesting disability-relate

This is a stong contender for the least surprising #UPC decision so far. Also a contender for the case most surprisingly brought.

No, you cannot go to the UPC for a determination of damages after prevailing in a patent infringement case at a **national** (German) court.

My colleague has written about the judgment in more detail.

https://eipamar.com/en/knowledge-hub/article/national-or-upc-jurisdiction-for-damages/

#Patents #Litigation #UPC #Damages #Admissibility