home.social

#abitron — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #abitron, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Seems like Justice Jackson's concurrence in #Abitron v. Hetronic undermines post-sale confusion. She suggests the infringement provisions are only triggered by domestic sales. Actionable conduct must be in commerce; confusion caused by personal use isn't enough. Her 2 hypos:
    #trademark

  2. Seems like Justice Jackson's concurrence in #Abitron v. Hetronic undermines post-sale confusion. She suggests the infringement provisions are only triggered by domestic sales. Actionable conduct must be in commerce; confusion caused by personal use isn't enough. Her 2 hypos:
    #trademark

  3. Seems like Justice Jackson's concurrence in #Abitron v. Hetronic undermines post-sale confusion. She suggests the infringement provisions are only triggered by domestic sales. Actionable conduct must be in commerce; confusion caused by personal use isn't enough. Her 2 hypos:
    #trademark

  4. Seems like Justice Jackson's concurrence in #Abitron v. Hetronic undermines post-sale confusion. She suggests the infringement provisions are only triggered by domestic sales. Actionable conduct must be in commerce; confusion caused by personal use isn't enough. Her 2 hypos:
    #trademark

  5. Seems like Justice Jackson's concurrence in #Abitron v. Hetronic undermines post-sale confusion. She suggests the infringement provisions are only triggered by domestic sales. Actionable conduct must be in commerce; confusion caused by personal use isn't enough. Her 2 hypos:
    #trademark

  6. 2 weeks from today!:
    PIJIP's IP @ SCOTUS Series will present a hybrid panel discussion of #Abitron v. #Hetronic featuring counsel for Petitioner and Respondent AND Tim Holbrook & Ted Davis!

    No dog toys, but a fascinating case about the territorial reach of the Lanham Act. May one sue for #trademark infringement when no consumers in the U.S. are confused?

  7. 2 weeks from today!:
    PIJIP's IP @ SCOTUS Series will present a hybrid panel discussion of #Abitron v. #Hetronic featuring counsel for Petitioner and Respondent AND Tim Holbrook & Ted Davis!

    No dog toys, but a fascinating case about the territorial reach of the Lanham Act. May one sue for #trademark infringement when no consumers in the U.S. are confused?

  8. 2 weeks from today!:
    PIJIP's IP @ SCOTUS Series will present a hybrid panel discussion of #Abitron v. #Hetronic featuring counsel for Petitioner and Respondent AND Tim Holbrook & Ted Davis!

    No dog toys, but a fascinating case about the territorial reach of the Lanham Act. May one sue for #trademark infringement when no consumers in the U.S. are confused?

  9. 2 weeks from today!:
    PIJIP's IP @ SCOTUS Series will present a hybrid panel discussion of #Abitron v. #Hetronic featuring counsel for Petitioner and Respondent AND Tim Holbrook & Ted Davis!

    No dog toys, but a fascinating case about the territorial reach of the Lanham Act. May one sue for #trademark infringement when no consumers in the U.S. are confused?

  10. 2 weeks from today!:
    PIJIP's IP @ SCOTUS Series will present a hybrid panel discussion of #Abitron v. #Hetronic featuring counsel for Petitioner and Respondent AND Tim Holbrook & Ted Davis!

    No dog toys, but a fascinating case about the territorial reach of the Lanham Act. May one sue for #trademark infringement when no consumers in the U.S. are confused?