Search
377 results for “travisfw”
-
What I hope for from AG-UI actually doesn't need AI at all. I am hoping for a human-centric #UXD layer that could be the front-end component of a #ComposableComputing / #MalleableSoftware / #BrutalistComputing / #PhenotropicProgramming paradigm, unlocking for common users most of the functionality of modern computing that most have relied on app developers to eventually roll out for them.
-
What I hope for from AG-UI actually doesn't need AI at all. I am hoping for a human-centric #UXD layer that could be the front-end component of a #ComposableComputing / #MalleableSoftware / #BrutalistComputing / #PhenotropicProgramming paradigm, unlocking for common users most of the functionality of modern computing that most have relied on app developers to eventually roll out for them.
-
What I hope for from AG-UI actually doesn't need AI at all. I am hoping for a human-centric #UXD layer that could be the front-end component of a #ComposableComputing / #MalleableSoftware / #BrutalistComputing / #PhenotropicProgramming paradigm, unlocking for common users most of the functionality of modern computing that most have relied on app developers to eventually roll out for them.
-
What I hope for from AG-UI actually doesn't need AI at all. I am hoping for a human-centric #UXD layer that could be the front-end component of a #ComposableComputing / #MalleableSoftware / #BrutalistComputing / #PhenotropicProgramming paradigm, unlocking for common users most of the functionality of modern computing that most have relied on app developers to eventually roll out for them.
-
-
-
-
-
#realMen like color, sparkles, and whatever the fuck they think is pretty. Because women don't own pretty. They can be pretty when they want, but let's not get off topic. When I'm buying clothes *I* want to wear, why can't I find anything with bright colors? Because clothing outlets only sell to men who are afraid of looking gay? Because men must signal how serious and manly they are by camoflaging into visually conservative modernist furniture?
-
This is what I am learning now. How best to maintain project management docs, specifications, tickets, and so on, on trunk.
I started out putting it in a separate branch and committing generated code to its own branch, and merging. I thought my prompting and writing was just for me, or at least, not what people would want to see.
#LiterateDevelopment #CleanCode
I have realized the error of my ways. The docs are the code. The English is the important part, now.
How are you doing it?
-
So, what does #LiterateDevelopment look like, now?
Well, it bears repeating that the *literate* part (which Robert C Martin would still call "code") should be committed to trunk. It needs to describe implementation, maintenance, testing, deployment, and all the same dimensions of utility documentation has always served.
But now, it needs to be on trunk, not in a separate repo or wiki.
Is that awkward? But we have the tools and many ways to do it, and we're just getting started.
-
… #LiterateDevelopment vs #VibeCoding. FIGHT!
Also, people have *always* vibe coded!
You don't have to be around long to find code that makes you wonder … until you realize the author just didn't care.
Vibe coding is the engine driving so many startups toward their exit. If the goal is to exit, not maintain, it just has to "work" until the ink on the sale dries.
Slop code has always been. #AI has merely lowered the bar for its creation.
These people are not writing literature.
-
Actually, I want to pit #LiterateDevelopment against #VibeCoding directly.
Clean code has *always* been literate. That means a dev with the skills to maintain the code base should be able to read the code. The *only* valid argument against documentation has been that the code is self-documenting. Okay, maybe with a high level language and enough care, the docs can be fairly spare. I would still argue for documentation, but I have lost some of those arguments.
… -
Caveats!
Primarily:
Docs are code!Tickets. Diagrams. The roadmap. All the project management stuff defines the software. With Claude (I have yet to branch out, but believe me, it's coming) I have begun committing project management documentation to trunk. (Rename master to trunk, you colonialist.)
*Everything* I generate with an LLM is based on committed English documentation.
This is #LiterateDevelopment! Thank you, Donald Knuth and your contemporaries. And thank you Robert C Martin.
-
@thestrangelet just the essential capacity to relax and enjoy an experience requires practice.
use it or lose it.
#allostasis -
@thestrangelet just the essential capacity to relax and enjoy an experience requires practice.
use it or lose it.
#allostasis -
@thestrangelet just the essential capacity to relax and enjoy an experience requires practice.
use it or lose it.
#allostasis -
@thestrangelet just the essential capacity to relax and enjoy an experience requires practice.
use it or lose it.
#allostasis -
@brave the appropriate alternative class of open technologies is #digitalProvenance and I don't get why everyone in #privsec isn't working hard on it.
-
@brave the appropriate alternative class of open technologies is #digitalProvenance and I don't get why everyone in #privsec isn't working hard on it.
-
@brave the appropriate alternative class of open technologies is #digitalProvenance and I don't get why everyone in #privsec isn't working hard on it.
-
@brave the appropriate alternative class of open technologies is #digitalProvenance and I don't get why everyone in #privsec isn't working hard on it.
-
@brave the appropriate alternative class of open technologies is #digitalProvenance and I don't get why everyone in #privsec isn't working hard on it.
-
@delta having *the same app* bridge people on existing email infra to the #privsec crowd has always been the biggest strength I appreciated Delta Chat for. forking, dropping legacy SMTP, or any such abandonment of that bridge would turn Delta Chat into just another chat protocol in my eye. if I'm going to push people to adopt secure messaging, Signal would always be the easier sell.
-
@delta having *the same app* bridge people on existing email infra to the #privsec crowd has always been the biggest strength I appreciated Delta Chat for. forking, dropping legacy SMTP, or any such abandonment of that bridge would turn Delta Chat into just another chat protocol in my eye. if I'm going to push people to adopt secure messaging, Signal would always be the easier sell.
-
@delta having *the same app* bridge people on existing email infra to the #privsec crowd has always been the biggest strength I appreciated Delta Chat for. forking, dropping legacy SMTP, or any such abandonment of that bridge would turn Delta Chat into just another chat protocol in my eye. if I'm going to push people to adopt secure messaging, Signal would always be the easier sell.
-
@delta having *the same app* bridge people on existing email infra to the #privsec crowd has always been the biggest strength I appreciated Delta Chat for. forking, dropping legacy SMTP, or any such abandonment of that bridge would turn Delta Chat into just another chat protocol in my eye. if I'm going to push people to adopt secure messaging, Signal would always be the easier sell.
-
@delta having *the same app* bridge people on existing email infra to the #privsec crowd has always been the biggest strength I appreciated Delta Chat for. forking, dropping legacy SMTP, or any such abandonment of that bridge would turn Delta Chat into just another chat protocol in my eye. if I'm going to push people to adopt secure messaging, Signal would always be the easier sell.