home.social

Search

3 results for “alwayscurious”

  1. Specifically:

    • The first one is about why ML-KEM-768 and ML-KEM-1024 not meeting the corresponding NIST security levels is not a cause for concern.
    • The second one calls for purpose-built IND-1CCA KEMs for ephemeral key exchange. They can have more noise, making them more robust against attacks.
  2. Anyone willing and able to review a couple of cryptography blog posts before I publish them?

    One is meant for the general public, while the other is mostly for other cryptographers.

  3. RE: infosec.exchange/@sophieschmie

    Correlary: regardless of what you do see, you don’t need to panic.

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.