home.social

Search

13 results for “inthehands”

  1. ❝
    “Never again” to me means “not on my watch.”
    ❞

  2. RE: mastodon.social/@KraftTea/1174

    Wow, this video is quite a mix of emotions.

  3. RE: hachyderm.io/@datarama/1174860

    I’ll second all of this. PHP is a great example of how great people can do great work with flawed tools. And aren’t all of our tools flawed? Isn’t all good engineering this way? Isn’t the last mile of all truly good work a human solving the problems they have with the choices they have? Shouldn’t we tip our cap to every human who sees the work through that arduous last mile? I certainly do, especially this week.

  4. Yes, important to note that the plot is entirely from a Confederate POV. It’s a throwaway plot — not as problematically soaked in Confederate Lost Cause nostalgia as, say, Gone With the Wind, merely an absurdity situated in Civil War Georgia — but it’s definitely one of those films you see for the filmmaking and not for the story. And it’s definitely one to skip if you’re not willing to compartmentalize that.

    mathstodon.xyz/@markgritter/11

  5. Now we have stunt doubles, compositing, nonlinear editing, CGI, a special effects empire.

    Back then, the special effects were “Buster Keaton is superhuman and completely unhinged.”

  6. The lesson of the previous post is that real actual voter suppression doesn’t actually look like high-tech vote swapping that the hero of the movie stop by watching the sinister computer screen and then hacking something.

    It looks like crappy processes with crappy interfaces and crappy accountability whose purpose (in a POSIWID sense) is to confuse, thwart, vex, bamboozle, and exhaust voters.

  7. RE: mstdn.social/@rysiek/117481761

    The General is a wonderful film, and I encourage you to see it if you never have.

  8. RE: phpc.social/@jrf_nl/1174819726

    It’s increasingly clear that funding open source does not make it sustainable either — but it’s a hell of a good start.

  9. RE: fed.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app

    I’ve heard reports exactly like this in • every • single • election • since 2004. And every time, when somebody finally manages to get to the bottom of it, it turns out the culprit is garbage UI design — not the machine secretly changing votes (because why would it •show• the user if it’s actually cheating?!).

    But these breathless stories about touchscreen voting aren’t going die unless touchscreen voting itself dies — because it’s a terrible idea.

    Paper ballots, marked directly by the voter themselves, validated and counted in an optical scanner. It’s not rocket science, folks.

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.