home.social

Search

12 results for “zyrxvo”

  1. @hannorein
    No, I don’t expect a huge difference in per-core performance either, though I haven’t compared benchmarks yet. Niagara's Skylake CPUs already supported #AXV512 (they even waited a bit for Skylake to be released) which gave a good #performance boost over AVX2. But core-density is the new MHz. 😉
    Though you may want to recompile your code if you’re currently directly linking to #MKL since Trillium has AMD CPUs. BLIS is faster on those.
    #HPC @zyrxvo

  2. @hannorein
    No, I don’t expect a huge difference in per-core performance either, though I haven’t compared benchmarks yet. Niagara's Skylake CPUs already supported #AXV512 (they even waited a bit for Skylake to be released) which gave a good #performance boost over AVX2. But core-density is the new MHz. 😉
    Though you may want to recompile your code if you’re currently directly linking to #MKL since Trillium has AMD CPUs. BLIS is faster on those.
    #HPC @zyrxvo

  3. @hannorein
    No, I don’t expect a huge difference in per-core performance either, though I haven’t compared benchmarks yet. Niagara's Skylake CPUs already supported #AXV512 (they even waited a bit for Skylake to be released) which gave a good #performance boost over AVX2. But core-density is the new MHz. 😉
    Though you may want to recompile your code if you’re currently directly linking to #MKL since Trillium has AMD CPUs. BLIS is faster on those.
    #HPC @zyrxvo

  4. @hannorein
    No, I don’t expect a huge difference in per-core performance either, though I haven’t compared benchmarks yet. Niagara's Skylake CPUs already supported #AXV512 (they even waited a bit for Skylake to be released) which gave a good #performance boost over AVX2. But core-density is the new MHz. 😉
    Though you may want to recompile your code if you’re currently directly linking to #MKL since Trillium has AMD CPUs. BLIS is faster on those.
    #HPC @zyrxvo

  5. @hannorein
    No, I don’t expect a huge difference in per-core performance either, though I haven’t compared benchmarks yet. Niagara's Skylake CPUs already supported #AXV512 (they even waited a bit for Skylake to be released) which gave a good #performance boost over AVX2. But core-density is the new MHz. 😉
    Though you may want to recompile your code if you’re currently directly linking to #MKL since Trillium has AMD CPUs. BLIS is faster on those.
    #HPC @zyrxvo

  6. @hannorein
    Really Cool!
    It’s nice to see that these Niagara nodes get a second life while making space for Trillium!
    However now just imagine that Trillium will have 192 core per node and therefore you could cram these 640 cores in 3 1/3 nodes. 🤯

    #HPC #SciNet #Alliance #DRAC
    @zyrxvo

  7. @hannorein
    Really Cool!
    It’s nice to see that these Niagara nodes get a second life while making space for Trillium!
    However now just imagine that Trillium will have 192 core per node and therefore you could cram these 640 cores in 3 1/3 nodes. 🤯

    #HPC #SciNet #Alliance #DRAC
    @zyrxvo

  8. @hannorein
    Really Cool!
    It’s nice to see that these Niagara nodes get a second life while making space for Trillium!
    However now just imagine that Trillium will have 192 core per node and therefore you could cram these 640 cores in 3 1/3 nodes. 🤯

    #HPC #SciNet #Alliance #DRAC
    @zyrxvo

  9. @hannorein
    Really Cool!
    It’s nice to see that these Niagara nodes get a second life while making space for Trillium!
    However now just imagine that Trillium will have 192 core per node and therefore you could cram these 640 cores in 3 1/3 nodes. 🤯

    #HPC #SciNet #Alliance #DRAC
    @zyrxvo

  10. @hannorein
    Really Cool!
    It’s nice to see that these Niagara nodes get a second life while making space for Trillium!
    However now just imagine that Trillium will have 192 core per node and therefore you could cram these 640 cores in 3 1/3 nodes. 🤯

    #HPC #SciNet #Alliance #DRAC
    @zyrxvo