Search
1000 results for “green_fed”
-
Most people on the fediverse are actually on servers with turnover in one way or the other. It's a turnover based system. We can use a non-technical federation protocol to create systemic change here.
The working name for this protocol is 'The Green Fediverse Protocol'.
It can be implemented here and now. The gist of the protocol is to only federate with servers that plant trees.
3/n #GreenFediverse
-
Most people on the fediverse are actually on servers with turnover in one way or the other. It's a turnover based system. We can use a non-technical federation protocol to create systemic change here.
The working name for this protocol is 'The Green Fediverse Protocol'.
It can be implemented here and now. The gist of the protocol is to only federate with servers that plant trees.
3/n #GreenFediverse
-
Most people on the fediverse are actually on servers with turnover in one way or the other. It's a turnover based system. We can use a non-technical federation protocol to create systemic change here.
The working name for this protocol is 'The Green Fediverse Protocol'.
It can be implemented here and now. The gist of the protocol is to only federate with servers that plant trees.
3/n #GreenFediverse
-
Most people on the fediverse are actually on servers with turnover in one way or the other. It's a turnover based system. We can use a non-technical federation protocol to create systemic change here.
The working name for this protocol is 'The Green Fediverse Protocol'.
It can be implemented here and now. The gist of the protocol is to only federate with servers that plant trees.
3/n #GreenFediverse
-
Most people on the fediverse are actually on servers with turnover in one way or the other. It's a turnover based system. We can use a non-technical federation protocol to create systemic change here.
The working name for this protocol is 'The Green Fediverse Protocol'.
It can be implemented here and now. The gist of the protocol is to only federate with servers that plant trees.
3/n #GreenFediverse
-
Verde que te quiero verde
(Green how I want you green)Federico Garcia Lorca’s bedroom, in Granada
(📷 with thanks to another poet, Pedro Larrea)
#everynightapoem #ofsorts -
Verde que te quiero verde
(Green how I want you green)Federico Garcia Lorca’s bedroom, in Granada
(📷 with thanks to another poet, Pedro Larrea)
#everynightapoem #ofsorts -
Verde que te quiero verde
(Green how I want you green)Federico Garcia Lorca’s bedroom, in Granada
(📷 with thanks to another poet, Pedro Larrea)
#everynightapoem #ofsorts -
Verde que te quiero verde
(Green how I want you green)Federico Garcia Lorca’s bedroom, in Granada
(📷 with thanks to another poet, Pedro Larrea)
#everynightapoem #ofsorts -
Verde que te quiero verde
(Green how I want you green)Federico Garcia Lorca’s bedroom, in Granada
(📷 with thanks to another poet, Pedro Larrea)
#everynightapoem #ofsorts -
Been seeing this emoji around the place, made by a "dsfgs" and published over i2p torrent, but i'm unable to find them nor a hashtag #glutplug which apparently talks about decentralizing content delivery on fedi, something i support.
anyway I just really like the emoji can anyone see the person who made it?
boosts will help, thanks
(image: a pink blue and green fediverse emoji that looks like a butterfly)
-
The common owner/master making the "best use of the #land" to #dispose of as seen fit by the owner is an archaic perversion of how we should now understand our relationship to land ownership and the #planet as a whole.
I've never met a human who has subdued, dominated, conquered, or disposed of one square centimeter of the #earth. That small parcel pre-existed #humanity and will continue to do so long after our kind has come and gone. That small parcel will continue to be #productive long after we've come and gone.
The better frame, is that of #lessor and #lessee because we do not own the earth, we #inhabit it. We cannot "dispose of" the land. As made abundantly clear by global climate change, we can only "dispose of" the climate that supports human inhabitation. Therefore, if some type of ownership exists, it is the totality of collective ownership belonging to each and every one of us.
#Legal #doctrine obviously exists to govern the lessor/lessee relationship. One such legal doctrine is that "Thou shalt not commit waste." But wasting the climate that supports human inhabitation is precisely what we've done. The collective fossil fuel burning "we" are engaging in, is in absolute violation of the doctrine of waste.
As lessees in contract with our collective ownership of the planet, we have therefore wasted the prospective rights of our progeny by utterly failing to uphold our duty.
Environmental lawyers have sought to create a priori "rights" held by the land. These efforts have always failed under the doctrine of "standing." I believe, by reframing the problem as "lessees contracted with a collective owner" model, a public policy argument exists that can withstand being dismissed for lack of standing.
I believe this is an original conception you're reading here first. Please correct me if I'm wrong -- and point me to the doctrine that supports your argument.
Also, please @ people/entities on #Mastodon who you think could help generate feedback and/or insight.
Thank you.
@breadandcircuses @earthfirst @gersh @greenpeace @EricHolthaus @[email protected] @ConserveChange @lessig @Climatehistories @CLE_Allard @joeleisen
@jschmidtnrdc @green #fediscience #Science #Enviroment #Law #EnvironmentalLawyer -
'Leprechaun Libations', an Irish gnome joyfully sipping green ale.
🍀Find me here: https://rafaelsalazar.com/featured/leprechaun-libations-rafael-salazar.html
#art #artist #stpatricksday #gnome #irish #greenale #leprechaun #stpaddys #clover #green #fediart #fediverse #fedigiftshop #flipboard @Flipboard #mastodon #mastoart #buyintoart #artmatters #ayearforart #rafaelsalazar #arte #artbooster
-
The common owner/master making the "best use of the #land" to #dispose of as seen fit by the owner is an archaic perversion of how we should now understand our relationship to land ownership and the #planet as a whole.
I've never met a human who has subdued, dominated, conquered, or disposed of one square centimeter of the #earth. That small parcel pre-existed #humanity and will continue to do so long after our kind has come and gone. That small parcel will continue to be #productive long after we've come and gone.
The better frame, is that of #lessor and #lessee because we do not own the earth, we #inhabit it. We cannot "dispose of" the land. As made abundantly clear by global climate change, we can only "dispose of" the climate that supports human inhabitation. Therefore, if some type of ownership exists, it is the totality of collective ownership belonging to each and every one of us.
#Legal #doctrine obviously exists to govern the lessor/lessee relationship. One such legal doctrine is that "Thou shalt not commit waste." But wasting the climate that supports human inhabitation is precisely what we've done. The collective fossil fuel burning "we" are engaging in, is in absolute violation of the doctrine of waste.
As lessees in contract with our collective ownership of the planet, we have therefore wasted the prospective rights of our progeny by utterly failing to uphold our duty.
Environmental lawyers have sought to create a priori "rights" held by the land. These efforts have always failed under the doctrine of "standing." I believe, by reframing the problem as "lessees contracted with a collective owner" model, a public policy argument exists that can withstand being dismissed for lack of standing.
I believe this is an original conception you're reading here first. Please correct me if I'm wrong -- and point me to the doctrine that supports your argument.
Also, please @ people/entities on #Mastodon who you think could help generate feedback and/or insight.
Thank you.
@breadandcircuses @earthfirst @gersh @greenpeace @EricHolthaus @[email protected] @ConserveChange @lessig @Climatehistories @CLE_Allard @joeleisen
@jschmidtnrdc @green #fediscience #Science #Enviroment #Law #EnvironmentalLawyer -
The common owner/master making the "best use of the #land" to #dispose of as seen fit by the owner is an archaic perversion of how we should now understand our relationship to land ownership and the #planet as a whole.
I've never met a human who has subdued, dominated, conquered, or disposed of one square centimeter of the #earth. That small parcel pre-existed #humanity and will continue to do so long after our kind has come and gone. That small parcel will continue to be #productive long after we've come and gone.
The better frame, is that of #lessor and #lessee because we do not own the earth, we #inhabit it. We cannot "dispose of" the land. As made abundantly clear by global climate change, we can only "dispose of" the climate that supports human inhabitation. Therefore, if some type of ownership exists, it is the totality of collective ownership belonging to each and every one of us.
#Legal #doctrine obviously exists to govern the lessor/lessee relationship. One such legal doctrine is that "Thou shalt not commit waste." But wasting the climate that supports human inhabitation is precisely what we've done. The collective fossil fuel burning "we" are engaging in, is in absolute violation of the doctrine of waste.
As lessees in contract with our collective ownership of the planet, we have therefore wasted the prospective rights of our progeny by utterly failing to uphold our duty.
Environmental lawyers have sought to create a priori "rights" held by the land. These efforts have always failed under the doctrine of "standing." I believe, by reframing the problem as "lessees contracted with a collective owner" model, a public policy argument exists that can withstand being dismissed for lack of standing.
I believe this is an original conception you're reading here first. Please correct me if I'm wrong -- and point me to the doctrine that supports your argument.
Also, please @ people/entities on #Mastodon who you think could help generate feedback and/or insight.
Thank you.
@breadandcircuses @earthfirst @gersh @greenpeace @EricHolthaus @[email protected] @ConserveChange @lessig @Climatehistories @CLE_Allard @joeleisen
@jschmidtnrdc @green #fediscience #Science #Enviroment #Law #EnvironmentalLawyer -
The common owner/master making the "best use of the #land" to #dispose of as seen fit by the owner is an archaic perversion of how we should now understand our relationship to land ownership and the #planet as a whole.
I've never met a human who has subdued, dominated, conquered, or disposed of one square centimeter of the #earth. That small parcel pre-existed #humanity and will continue to do so long after our kind has come and gone. That small parcel will continue to be #productive long after we've come and gone.
The better frame, is that of #lessor and #lessee because we do not own the earth, we #inhabit it. We cannot "dispose of" the land. As made abundantly clear by global climate change, we can only "dispose of" the climate that supports human inhabitation. Therefore, if some type of ownership exists, it is the totality of collective ownership belonging to each and every one of us.
#Legal #doctrine obviously exists to govern the lessor/lessee relationship. One such legal doctrine is that "Thou shalt not commit waste." But wasting the climate that supports human inhabitation is precisely what we've done. The collective fossil fuel burning "we" are engaging in, is in absolute violation of the doctrine of waste.
As lessees in contract with our collective ownership of the planet, we have therefore wasted the prospective rights of our progeny by utterly failing to uphold our duty.
Environmental lawyers have sought to create a priori "rights" held by the land. These efforts have always failed under the doctrine of "standing." I believe, by reframing the problem as "lessees contracted with a collective owner" model, a public policy argument exists that can withstand being dismissed for lack of standing.
I believe this is an original conception you're reading here first. Please correct me if I'm wrong -- and point me to the doctrine that supports your argument.
Also, please @ people/entities on #Mastodon who you think could help generate feedback and/or insight.
Thank you.
@breadandcircuses @earthfirst @gersh @greenpeace @EricHolthaus @[email protected] @ConserveChange @lessig @Climatehistories @CLE_Allard @joeleisen
@jschmidtnrdc @green #fediscience #Science #Enviroment #Law #EnvironmentalLawyer -
InstaFarm Automated Indoor Microgreens Garden Review: Easy Being Green
https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.wired.com/review/instafarm-automated-indoor-microgreens-garden/
-
InstaFarm Automated Indoor Microgreens Garden Review: Easy Being Green
https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.wired.com/review/instafarm-automated-indoor-microgreens-garden/
-
InstaFarm Automated Indoor Microgreens Garden Review: Easy Being Green
https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.wired.com/review/instafarm-automated-indoor-microgreens-garden/
-
Who Is Sienna Miller's Boyfriend? All About Oli Green
https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://people.com/all-about-oli-green-sienna-miller-11860301
-
Manchester Evening News: Number one for news, opinion, sport & celebrity news [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·Keir Starmer called 'traitor' and 'Jew harmer' as he's heckled on visit to Golders Green
-
Marissa Mayer’s new startup Dazzle raises $8M led by Forerunner’s Kirsten Green
-
Gracie Hunt, Daughter of Billionaire Kansas City Chiefs Owner Clark Hunt, Announces Engagement to Boyfriend Derek Green
-
Blue Green Dots and Stripes makes a cute tote! See all products here: https://1-lisas-baker.pixels.com/featured/blue-green-dots-and-stripes-lisa-s-baker.html
#abstract #abstractart #art #arte #artwork #wallart #homedecor #artforhome #totes #totebag #artforsale #puzzles #artprints #framedprints #blue #green #mastoart #fediart #fediverse #whimsical #dots #stripes #fun #funabstract #buyintoart #tote
