home.social

Search

146 results for “gnutools”

  1. @sysedit In general, I totally can relate you your statement.

    However, there is one additional notion to it: if you're using a really(!) powerful and flexible tool, you might need less tool switches for slightly different jobs.

    IMO that's one of the (meta-)reasons why there are so many Windows programs out there: normal users aren't using flexible tools like #GNUtools (UNIX pipes) or #Emacs that are able to match a wide range of requirements where "normal people" are using a specific tool for one specific use-case.

    I see the tendency that, e.g., every app needs to have a "read later/notify me later" feature or its own spell checker and so forth. From a tech perspective, this is not very clever.

    If you do have your flexible #knowledgemanagement tool, you can implement all sorts of "do stuff later" functionality with it, in case your tools are flexible enough to interact with each other.

    Furthermore: our requirements differ more than we think: karl-voit.at/2021/01/18/tool-c

    #PIM #PKM

  2. @sysedit In general, I totally can relate you your statement.

    However, there is one additional notion to it: if you're using a really(!) powerful and flexible tool, you might need less tool switches for slightly different jobs.

    IMO that's one of the (meta-)reasons why there are so many Windows programs out there: normal users aren't using flexible tools like #GNUtools (UNIX pipes) or #Emacs that are able to match a wide range of requirements where "normal people" are using a specific tool for one specific use-case.

    I see the tendency that, e.g., every app needs to have a "read later/notify me later" feature or its own spell checker and so forth. From a tech perspective, this is not very clever.

    If you do have your flexible #knowledgemanagement tool, you can implement all sorts of "do stuff later" functionality with it, in case your tools are flexible enough to interact with each other.

    Furthermore: our requirements differ more than we think: karl-voit.at/2021/01/18/tool-c

    #PIM #PKM

  3. @sysedit In general, I totally can relate you your statement.

    However, there is one additional notion to it: if you're using a really(!) powerful and flexible tool, you might need less tool switches for slightly different jobs.

    IMO that's one of the (meta-)reasons why there are so many Windows programs out there: normal users aren't using flexible tools like #GNUtools (UNIX pipes) or #Emacs that are able to match a wide range of requirements where "normal people" are using a specific tool for one specific use-case.

    I see the tendency that, e.g., every app needs to have a "read later/notify me later" feature or its own spell checker and so forth. From a tech perspective, this is not very clever.

    If you do have your flexible #knowledgemanagement tool, you can implement all sorts of "do stuff later" functionality with it, in case your tools are flexible enough to interact with each other.

    Furthermore: our requirements differ more than we think: karl-voit.at/2021/01/18/tool-c

    #PIM #PKM

  4. @sysedit In general, I totally can relate you your statement.

    However, there is one additional notion to it: if you're using a really(!) powerful and flexible tool, you might need less tool switches for slightly different jobs.

    IMO that's one of the (meta-)reasons why there are so many Windows programs out there: normal users aren't using flexible tools like #GNUtools (UNIX pipes) or #Emacs that are able to match a wide range of requirements where "normal people" are using a specific tool for one specific use-case.

    I see the tendency that, e.g., every app needs to have a "read later/notify me later" feature or its own spell checker and so forth. From a tech perspective, this is not very clever.

    If you do have your flexible #knowledgemanagement tool, you can implement all sorts of "do stuff later" functionality with it, in case your tools are flexible enough to interact with each other.

    Furthermore: our requirements differ more than we think: karl-voit.at/2021/01/18/tool-c

    #PIM #PKM

  5. Where are @gnutools job listings posted nowadays? The #FSF jobs page seems pretty much dead, and I know the mailing lists are not the right place to post either jobs or resumes. 🤔 #gnutools #gcc #binutils #gdb #glibc #openmp

  6. Where are @gnutools job listings posted nowadays? The #FSF jobs page seems pretty much dead, and I know the mailing lists are not the right place to post either jobs or resumes. 🤔 #gnutools #gcc #binutils #gdb #glibc #openmp

  7. Where are @gnutools job listings posted nowadays? The #FSF jobs page seems pretty much dead, and I know the mailing lists are not the right place to post either jobs or resumes. 🤔 #gnutools #gcc #binutils #gdb #glibc #openmp

  8. Where are @gnutools job listings posted nowadays? The jobs page seems pretty much dead, and I know the mailing lists are not the right place to post either jobs or resumes. 🤔

  9. Where are @gnutools job listings posted nowadays? The #FSF jobs page seems pretty much dead, and I know the mailing lists are not the right place to post either jobs or resumes. 🤔 #gnutools #gcc #binutils #gdb #glibc #openmp

  10. I'm looking for a new #gnutools job; long story short, my current employer is pushing me to retire early as part of a division-wide "reorganization", but I want to keep working. I'm a current #gcc and #binutils maintainer and have also contributed to #gdb, #glibc, #newlib, and #qemu. Lately I've been working on adding GCC front-end support for #openmp, but I've also done back-end things for multiple architectures, and I write documentation. DM me for more details and contact info.

  11. I'm looking for a new #gnutools job; long story short, my current employer is pushing me to retire early as part of a division-wide "reorganization", but I want to keep working. I'm a current #gcc and #binutils maintainer and have also contributed to #gdb, #glibc, #newlib, and #qemu. Lately I've been working on adding GCC front-end support for #openmp, but I've also done back-end things for multiple architectures, and I write documentation. DM me for more details and contact info.

  12. I'm looking for a new #gnutools job; long story short, my current employer is pushing me to retire early as part of a division-wide "reorganization", but I want to keep working. I'm a current #gcc and #binutils maintainer and have also contributed to #gdb, #glibc, #newlib, and #qemu. Lately I've been working on adding GCC front-end support for #openmp, but I've also done back-end things for multiple architectures, and I write documentation. DM me for more details and contact info.

  13. I'm looking for a new job; long story short, my current employer is pushing me to retire early as part of a division-wide "reorganization", but I want to keep working. I'm a current and maintainer and have also contributed to , , , and . Lately I've been working on adding GCC front-end support for , but I've also done back-end things for multiple architectures, and I write documentation. DM me for more details and contact info.

  14. I'm looking for a new #gnutools job; long story short, my current employer is pushing me to retire early as part of a division-wide "reorganization", but I want to keep working. I'm a current #gcc and #binutils maintainer and have also contributed to #gdb, #glibc, #newlib, and #qemu. Lately I've been working on adding GCC front-end support for #openmp, but I've also done back-end things for multiple architectures, and I write documentation. DM me for more details and contact info.

  15. .@Intel #GraniteRapids Support Submitted For The @gnutools #GCC Compiler

    -- Nice seeing Intel having primed Granite Rapids, Sierra Forest, and Grand Ridge for GCC 13. That's the same version where AMD is introducing (belated) Znver4 support.

    phoronix.com/news/Intel-Granit

    Original tweet : twitter.com/phoronix/status/15

  16. .@Intel #GraniteRapids Support Submitted For The @gnutools #GCC Compiler

    -- Nice seeing Intel having primed Granite Rapids, Sierra Forest, and Grand Ridge for GCC 13. That's the same version where AMD is introducing (belated) Znver4 support.

    phoronix.com/news/Intel-Granit

    Original tweet : twitter.com/phoronix/status/15

  17. .@Intel #GraniteRapids Support Submitted For The @gnutools #GCC Compiler

    -- Nice seeing Intel having primed Granite Rapids, Sierra Forest, and Grand Ridge for GCC 13. That's the same version where AMD is introducing (belated) Znver4 support.

    phoronix.com/news/Intel-Granit

    Original tweet : twitter.com/phoronix/status/15

  18. Inspired by a short article called "I like Makefiles" I have adapted my #Bootstrap5 #SCSS template to make use of the Make tool, and it's cool 🙂
    I'm gonna use it more often for other projects.

    #GNUtools #webdev
    🌐 Project repository: codeberg.org/amarok24/template
    📝 Link to the mentioned article: switowski.com/blog/i-like-make

  19. .@IntelDevTools Sends Out #MeteorLake & #SierraForest Patches For The @gnutools #GCC Compiler

    -- Great seeing @IntelSoftware @OpenAtIntel continue in their early enablement work with #opensource compilers for new x86_64 instructions & future CPUs!!

    phoronix.com/news/Intel-GCC-MT

    Original tweet : twitter.com/phoronix/status/15

  20. Yesterday @SUSE published our paper "Advanced Optimization and New Capabilities of GCC 10:" documentation.suse.com/sbp/all
    I hope most of it is useful and interesting for all users. We recommend optimization options, discuss LTO, PGO and look at speeding up SPEC and .