home.social

Search

1000 results for “elijax”

  1. La San Diego Comic Con Málaga 2026 anuncia sus primeros confirmados: Elijah Wood y Sean Astin por el 25º aniversario de 'El señor de los anillos' sensacine.com/noticias/cine/no #cine #series

  2. La San Diego Comic Con Málaga 2026 anuncia sus primeros confirmados: Elijah Wood y Sean Astin por el 25º aniversario de 'El señor de los anillos' sensacine.com/noticias/cine/no #cine #series

  3. La San Diego Comic Con Málaga 2026 anuncia sus primeros confirmados: Elijah Wood y Sean Astin por el 25º aniversario de 'El señor de los anillos' sensacine.com/noticias/cine/no #cine #series

  4. La San Diego Comic Con Málaga 2026 anuncia sus primeros confirmados: Elijah Wood y Sean Astin por el 25º aniversario de 'El señor de los anillos' sensacine.com/noticias/cine/no #cine #series

  5. La San Diego Comic Con Málaga 2026 anuncia sus primeros confirmados: Elijah Wood y Sean Astin por el 25º aniversario de 'El señor de los anillos' sensacine.com/noticias/cine/no #cine #series

  6. Quote from Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺 (@ejmalrai):

    Iranian media: The Emiratis, in coordination with the United States, attempted to gather vessels and push them through the Strait of Hormuz in order, as they saw it, to neutralise Iran’s strategic leverage.

    The Islamic Republic’s first response was reportedly to order ships to evacuate and withdraw from Ras Al Khaimah's port towards Dubai.

    Since this morning, new operational boundaries for managing the Strait of Hormuz have reportedly been announced. These include pressure on all ports belonging to what Iranian media described as the “United Hebrew Emirates,” which Tehran presents as a calibrated response to the enemy’s naval blockade plan.

    According to the same sources, another Emirati oil tanker attempted to cross the Strait under the protection of an American frigate. The frigate, allegedly sailing with its radar switched off, was met with warning fire, while the oil tanker was struck by a drone.

    On several other occasions, commercial vessels, oil tankers and U.S. naval units reportedly attempted to cross the Strait. Each time, they were met with verbal and operational warnings.

    #Iran #Islam #Dubai #Tehran #Hormuz #America

  7. DATE: May 12, 2026 at 02:00PM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Does romantic rejection hurt more than platonic rejection? A new study says no

    URL: psypost.org/does-romantic-reje

    Most people assume that rejection by a potential romantic partner is far more painful than rejection by a prospective friend. However, new research published in the European Journal of Social Psychology suggests that, when rejection is actually experienced, the emotional impact is remarkably similar regardless of whether it comes from a romantic or a platonic source.

    Romantic rejection is often seen as uniquely devastating, in part because modern societies place heavy emotional expectations on romantic relationships. However, researchers have long noted that humans are broadly motivated by a fundamental need for belonging. Social rejection tends to hurt across all contexts because it threatens shared psychological needs, such as feeling valued, in control, and meaningful.

    What has been less clear is whether rejection by a potential romantic partner is more painful than rejection in a friendship context. Given the intense expectations placed on romantic relationships—which are often expected to fulfill a wide range of emotional and personal needs—it has seemed plausible that being denied such a relationship would be especially distressing.

    To examine these assumptions, researchers conducted three related studies. In the first, 1,500 American adults were asked which type of rejection they believed would be more painful: being turned down by a potential romantic partner or by a potential friend. The responses largely reflected common intuitions: approximately half expected romantic rejection to be worse, compared with roughly a quarter who anticipated greater pain from platonic rejection, while the remaining participants believed both would be equally distressing.

    Led by Natasha R. Wood of Leiden University in the Netherlands, the team then tested real‑time responses to rejection in a controlled experimental setting. In Study 2, 934 single adults aged 18 to 29 (57.9% women; average age 23.4) were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: accepted or rejected by either a potential romantic partner or a potential platonic friend.

    Participants engaged with a simulated app environment, designed to resemble dating or social networking platforms, and received either positive or negative feedback from profiles purportedly representing other users. Afterward, they reported how they felt across a range of measures capturing their sense of belonging, self-worth, and emotional wellbeing.

    The researchers found that rejection reliably reduced wellbeing, and acceptance reliably enhanced it, but the type of relationship framing—romantic versus platonic—had no effect on emotional outcomes. The team also tested whether feelings of romantic instrumentality (seeing a partner as someone who would help you achieve more of your goals in life) or self-blame might explain any romantic-versus-platonic difference in pain. Neither emerged as a meaningful driver.

    In a third study involving 477 participants (73.6% women; average age 20.3), predicted emotional reactions were compared with actual emotional experiences. The researchers also added a “stranger control” group, in which participants were told there was no expectation of forming a relationship of any kind.

    Participants were asked to forecast how they would feel before receiving feedback, then report how they felt afterward. Once again, relationship type did not meaningfully influence emotional responses; rejection by a stranger hurt just as much as rejection by a potential date. Furthermore, participants consistently overestimated the intensity of both outcomes, particularly the pain of rejection.

    Wood and colleagues put it simply: “It seems the experience of being accepted is so positive and the experience of being rejected is so negative that it does not matter who is doing so.”

    There are, however, important caveats to keep in mind. For example, the study was conducted exclusively with American participants, which limits how far the findings can be generalised across different cultures where romantic and platonic relationships may be valued differently. Furthermore, the simulated app environment may not perfectly capture the intense emotions of an in-person rejection.

    The study, “What Could Have Been: Predicted and Actual Exclusion by Potential Romantic Partners and Platonic Friends,” was authored by Natasha R. Wood, Sydney G. Wicks, Adam J. Beam, Elijah P. Mudryk, Ellie Bray, and Andrew H. Hales.

    URL: psypost.org/does-romantic-reje

    -------------------------------------------------

    DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot

    Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: nationalpsychologist.com

    EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: subscribe-article-digests.clin

    READ ONLINE: read-the-rss-mega-archive.clin

    It's primitive... but it works... mostly...

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #romanticrejection #platonicrejection #socialpsychology #belongingness #emotionalwellbeing #rejectionresearch #datingapps #selfworth #humanneeds #relationshipsstudy

  8. DATE: May 12, 2026 at 02:00PM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Does romantic rejection hurt more than platonic rejection? A new study says no

    URL: psypost.org/does-romantic-reje

    Most people assume that rejection by a potential romantic partner is far more painful than rejection by a prospective friend. However, new research published in the European Journal of Social Psychology suggests that, when rejection is actually experienced, the emotional impact is remarkably similar regardless of whether it comes from a romantic or a platonic source.

    Romantic rejection is often seen as uniquely devastating, in part because modern societies place heavy emotional expectations on romantic relationships. However, researchers have long noted that humans are broadly motivated by a fundamental need for belonging. Social rejection tends to hurt across all contexts because it threatens shared psychological needs, such as feeling valued, in control, and meaningful.

    What has been less clear is whether rejection by a potential romantic partner is more painful than rejection in a friendship context. Given the intense expectations placed on romantic relationships—which are often expected to fulfill a wide range of emotional and personal needs—it has seemed plausible that being denied such a relationship would be especially distressing.

    To examine these assumptions, researchers conducted three related studies. In the first, 1,500 American adults were asked which type of rejection they believed would be more painful: being turned down by a potential romantic partner or by a potential friend. The responses largely reflected common intuitions: approximately half expected romantic rejection to be worse, compared with roughly a quarter who anticipated greater pain from platonic rejection, while the remaining participants believed both would be equally distressing.

    Led by Natasha R. Wood of Leiden University in the Netherlands, the team then tested real‑time responses to rejection in a controlled experimental setting. In Study 2, 934 single adults aged 18 to 29 (57.9% women; average age 23.4) were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: accepted or rejected by either a potential romantic partner or a potential platonic friend.

    Participants engaged with a simulated app environment, designed to resemble dating or social networking platforms, and received either positive or negative feedback from profiles purportedly representing other users. Afterward, they reported how they felt across a range of measures capturing their sense of belonging, self-worth, and emotional wellbeing.

    The researchers found that rejection reliably reduced wellbeing, and acceptance reliably enhanced it, but the type of relationship framing—romantic versus platonic—had no effect on emotional outcomes. The team also tested whether feelings of romantic instrumentality (seeing a partner as someone who would help you achieve more of your goals in life) or self-blame might explain any romantic-versus-platonic difference in pain. Neither emerged as a meaningful driver.

    In a third study involving 477 participants (73.6% women; average age 20.3), predicted emotional reactions were compared with actual emotional experiences. The researchers also added a “stranger control” group, in which participants were told there was no expectation of forming a relationship of any kind.

    Participants were asked to forecast how they would feel before receiving feedback, then report how they felt afterward. Once again, relationship type did not meaningfully influence emotional responses; rejection by a stranger hurt just as much as rejection by a potential date. Furthermore, participants consistently overestimated the intensity of both outcomes, particularly the pain of rejection.

    Wood and colleagues put it simply: “It seems the experience of being accepted is so positive and the experience of being rejected is so negative that it does not matter who is doing so.”

    There are, however, important caveats to keep in mind. For example, the study was conducted exclusively with American participants, which limits how far the findings can be generalised across different cultures where romantic and platonic relationships may be valued differently. Furthermore, the simulated app environment may not perfectly capture the intense emotions of an in-person rejection.

    The study, “What Could Have Been: Predicted and Actual Exclusion by Potential Romantic Partners and Platonic Friends,” was authored by Natasha R. Wood, Sydney G. Wicks, Adam J. Beam, Elijah P. Mudryk, Ellie Bray, and Andrew H. Hales.

    URL: psypost.org/does-romantic-reje

    -------------------------------------------------

    DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot

    Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: nationalpsychologist.com

    EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: subscribe-article-digests.clin

    READ ONLINE: read-the-rss-mega-archive.clin

    It's primitive... but it works... mostly...

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #romanticrejection #platonicrejection #socialpsychology #belongingness #emotionalwellbeing #rejectionresearch #datingapps #selfworth #humanneeds #relationshipsstudy

  9. DATE: May 12, 2026 at 02:00PM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Does romantic rejection hurt more than platonic rejection? A new study says no

    URL: psypost.org/does-romantic-reje

    Most people assume that rejection by a potential romantic partner is far more painful than rejection by a prospective friend. However, new research published in the European Journal of Social Psychology suggests that, when rejection is actually experienced, the emotional impact is remarkably similar regardless of whether it comes from a romantic or a platonic source.

    Romantic rejection is often seen as uniquely devastating, in part because modern societies place heavy emotional expectations on romantic relationships. However, researchers have long noted that humans are broadly motivated by a fundamental need for belonging. Social rejection tends to hurt across all contexts because it threatens shared psychological needs, such as feeling valued, in control, and meaningful.

    What has been less clear is whether rejection by a potential romantic partner is more painful than rejection in a friendship context. Given the intense expectations placed on romantic relationships—which are often expected to fulfill a wide range of emotional and personal needs—it has seemed plausible that being denied such a relationship would be especially distressing.

    To examine these assumptions, researchers conducted three related studies. In the first, 1,500 American adults were asked which type of rejection they believed would be more painful: being turned down by a potential romantic partner or by a potential friend. The responses largely reflected common intuitions: approximately half expected romantic rejection to be worse, compared with roughly a quarter who anticipated greater pain from platonic rejection, while the remaining participants believed both would be equally distressing.

    Led by Natasha R. Wood of Leiden University in the Netherlands, the team then tested real‑time responses to rejection in a controlled experimental setting. In Study 2, 934 single adults aged 18 to 29 (57.9% women; average age 23.4) were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: accepted or rejected by either a potential romantic partner or a potential platonic friend.

    Participants engaged with a simulated app environment, designed to resemble dating or social networking platforms, and received either positive or negative feedback from profiles purportedly representing other users. Afterward, they reported how they felt across a range of measures capturing their sense of belonging, self-worth, and emotional wellbeing.

    The researchers found that rejection reliably reduced wellbeing, and acceptance reliably enhanced it, but the type of relationship framing—romantic versus platonic—had no effect on emotional outcomes. The team also tested whether feelings of romantic instrumentality (seeing a partner as someone who would help you achieve more of your goals in life) or self-blame might explain any romantic-versus-platonic difference in pain. Neither emerged as a meaningful driver.

    In a third study involving 477 participants (73.6% women; average age 20.3), predicted emotional reactions were compared with actual emotional experiences. The researchers also added a “stranger control” group, in which participants were told there was no expectation of forming a relationship of any kind.

    Participants were asked to forecast how they would feel before receiving feedback, then report how they felt afterward. Once again, relationship type did not meaningfully influence emotional responses; rejection by a stranger hurt just as much as rejection by a potential date. Furthermore, participants consistently overestimated the intensity of both outcomes, particularly the pain of rejection.

    Wood and colleagues put it simply: “It seems the experience of being accepted is so positive and the experience of being rejected is so negative that it does not matter who is doing so.”

    There are, however, important caveats to keep in mind. For example, the study was conducted exclusively with American participants, which limits how far the findings can be generalised across different cultures where romantic and platonic relationships may be valued differently. Furthermore, the simulated app environment may not perfectly capture the intense emotions of an in-person rejection.

    The study, “What Could Have Been: Predicted and Actual Exclusion by Potential Romantic Partners and Platonic Friends,” was authored by Natasha R. Wood, Sydney G. Wicks, Adam J. Beam, Elijah P. Mudryk, Ellie Bray, and Andrew H. Hales.

    URL: psypost.org/does-romantic-reje

    -------------------------------------------------

    DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot

    Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: nationalpsychologist.com

    EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: subscribe-article-digests.clin

    READ ONLINE: read-the-rss-mega-archive.clin

    It's primitive... but it works... mostly...

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #romanticrejection #platonicrejection #socialpsychology #belongingness #emotionalwellbeing #rejectionresearch #datingapps #selfworth #humanneeds #relationshipsstudy

  10. Morning Buzz: This Is Where USC’s Season Will Be Determined

    I’ve been putting together a USC depth chart since the end of spring football and here is where I think USC has a “concern.”

    This might not be exactly the way it ends up in the fall but this is the general corps of players. And remember, teams cannot add transfers this summer.

    My issue: How many proven performers do you see in the back seven of the defense? How many bona-fide impact players? There are a lot of players with potential but who can you definitely say he is someone that will impact games in a positive way? Is this a College Football Playoff defense?

    I think the defensive line looks better and I will show that later. But right now, I feel like USC’s season will depend on how this group of players develops.

    LB/Desman Stephens/Sr./Deven Bryant, Jr.

    LB/Jadyn Walker/So./Elijah Newby, So.

    CB/Marcelles Williams/Jr./Prophet Brown, Sr.

    CB/Jontez Williams/Sr../Elbert Hill, Fr.

    CB/Alex Graham/Fr./RJ Sermons, Fr.

    SS/Kennedy Urlacher/Jr../Madden Riordan, Fr.

    FS/Christian Pierce/Sr./Kendarius Reddick. So.

    #collegeFootball #featured #FOOTBALL #usc
  11. Morning Buzz: This Is Where USC’s Season Will Be Determined

    I’ve been putting together a USC depth chart since the end of spring football and here is where I think USC has a “concern.”

    This might not be exactly the way it ends up in the fall but this is the general corps of players. And remember, teams cannot add transfers this summer.

    My issue: How many proven performers do you see in the back seven of the defense? How many bona-fide impact players? There are a lot of players with potential but who can you definitely say he is someone that will impact games in a positive way? Is this a College Football Playoff defense?

    I think the defensive line looks better and I will show that later. But right now, I feel like USC’s season will depend on how this group of players develops.

    LB/Desman Stephens/Sr./Deven Bryant, Jr.

    LB/Jadyn Walker/So./Elijah Newby, So.

    CB/Marcelles Williams/Jr./Prophet Brown, Sr.

    CB/Jontez Williams/Sr../Elbert Hill, Fr.

    CB/Alex Graham/Fr./RJ Sermons, Fr.

    SS/Kennedy Urlacher/Jr../Madden Riordan, Fr.

    FS/Christian Pierce/Sr./Kendarius Reddick. So.

    #collegeFootball #featured #FOOTBALL #usc
  12. Morning Buzz: This Is Where USC’s Season Will Be Determined

    I’ve been putting together a USC depth chart since the end of spring football and here is where I think USC has a “concern.”

    This might not be exactly the way it ends up in the fall but this is the general corps of players. And remember, teams cannot add transfers this summer.

    My issue: How many proven performers do you see in the back seven of the defense? How many bona-fide impact players? There are a lot of players with potential but who can you definitely say he is someone that will impact games in a positive way? Is this a College Football Playoff defense?

    I think the defensive line looks better and I will show that later. But right now, I feel like USC’s season will depend on how this group of players develops.

    LB/Desman Stephens/Sr./Deven Bryant, Jr.

    LB/Jadyn Walker/So./Elijah Newby, So.

    CB/Marcelles Williams/Jr./Prophet Brown, Sr.

    CB/Jontez Williams/Sr../Elbert Hill, Fr.

    CB/Alex Graham/Fr./RJ Sermons, Fr.

    SS/Kennedy Urlacher/Jr../Madden Riordan, Fr.

    FS/Christian Pierce/Sr./Kendarius Reddick. So.

    #collegeFootball #featured #FOOTBALL #usc
  13. Morning Buzz: This Is Where USC’s Season Will Be Determined

    I’ve been putting together a USC depth chart since the end of spring football and here is where I think USC has a “concern.”

    This might not be exactly the way it ends up in the fall but this is the general corps of players. And remember, teams cannot add transfers this summer.

    My issue: How many proven performers do you see in the back seven of the defense? How many bona-fide impact players? There are a lot of players with potential but who can you definitely say he is someone that will impact games in a positive way? Is this a College Football Playoff defense?

    I think the defensive line looks better and I will show that later. But right now, I feel like USC’s season will depend on how this group of players develops.

    LB/Desman Stephens/Sr./Deven Bryant, Jr.

    LB/Jadyn Walker/So./Elijah Newby, So.

    CB/Marcelles Williams/Jr./Prophet Brown, Sr.

    CB/Jontez Williams/Sr../Elbert Hill, Fr.

    CB/Alex Graham/Fr./RJ Sermons, Fr.

    SS/Kennedy Urlacher/Jr../Madden Riordan, Fr.

    FS/Christian Pierce/Sr./Kendarius Reddick. So.

    #collegeFootball #featured #FOOTBALL #usc