home.social

Search

1000 results for “ayliu”

  1. @ayliu @kfitz Digital Pedagogy in the Humanities authors broach this topic throughout the collection in various keywords and assignment briefs. Might we start with those curators who already work in this area, specifically as it relates to pedagogy so that we include the truly teaching-intensive faculty in this conversation?
    digitalpedagogy.hcommons.org/s
    #digitalhumanities #digitalpedagogy #digitalhumanitiespedagogy

  2. @quinnanya @ayliu I know there is some additional work on this (in German): zfdg.de/wp_2023_001 or join us for our #TaDiRAH workshop in Graz #DH2023 to discuss options!

  3. Happy New Year! For Mastodoners going to #mla24 , you might care, even worry about how digital scholarship is recognized, evaluated in lit/languages. If so, please join me, @ayliu , Alison Booth, + Kandice Sharren at our sponsored panel bright n early on Saturday AM! infotech.mla.hcommons.org/2023

  4. Just gave my most public explanation of digital humanities. Context: the only humanities talk amid science/social science talks in inauguration event for new university Chancellor. Audience: community members, officials & regents, staff, science faculty, etc. My 10-min. talk youtu.be/6RekMjVM1LY?t=3255

  5. Session 148 at organized by MLA’s Committee on Information Tech (CIT): “Ethics and Practice of AIs in the Academy” (Description: infotech.mla.hcommons.org/2023). Presenters: Jon Chun, Gabriel Hankins, Carly Schnitzler. Respondent: Rita Raley.

  6. presenters: Elisa Beshero-Bondar, Alison Booth, Kandice Sharren. Respondent: Alan Liu. Description & pre-circulated materials: infotech.mla.hcommons.org/2023

  7. Session 404 at organized by MLA’s Committee on Information Tech (CIT): "Evaluating Digital Scholarship Today” (infotech.mla.hcommons.org/2023). CIT members & others discuss what’s needed to revise MLA’s guidelines for evaluating digital work (last revision was in 2012).

  8. I’ve been pouring the hours into working with MLA’s Committee on Information Tech (CIT) to revise MLA’s guidelines for evaluating digital work. Near the end of my career, I think this may actually be the most valuable use of the rest of me. Will share some of CIT’s much expanded draft at .

  9. I’ll be respondent at on “Evaluating Digital Scholarship Today” (infotech.mla.hcommons.org/2023). I’ll share highlights from MLA Committee on Information Tech’s draft revision of MLA’s guidelines for evaluating digital work. CIT & I have been working hard on new guidelines.

  10. presenters: Elisa Beshero-Bondar, Alison Booth, Kandice Sharren. Respondent: Alan Liu. Description & pre-circulated materials: infotech.mla.hcommons.org/2023

  11. Session 404 at organized by MLA’s Committee on Information Tech (CIT): "Evaluating Digital Scholarship Today” (infotech.mla.hcommons.org/2023). CIT members & others offer thoughts on what is needed to revise MLA’s guidelines for evaluating digital work (last version: 2012).

  12. Session 148 at organized by MLA’s Committee on Information Tech (CIT) -- “Ethics and Practice of AIs in the Academy”--“What are practical, desired, and ethical uses of AIs by students, instructors, researchers, and administrators?” Full description: infotech.mla.hcommons.org/2023

  13. Session 148 at organized by MLA’s Committee on Information Tech (CIT): “Ethics and Practice of AIs in the Academy” (Description: infotech.mla.hcommons.org/2023). Presenters: Jon Chun, Gabriel Hankins, Carly Schnitzler. Respondent: Rita Raley.

  14. CFP from our MLA Committee on Information Technology for session on:

    “Ethics and Practice of AIs in the Academy” bit.ly/mla2024CITcfp

    Proposals deadline 15 March 2023.

    Should MLA in the future create guidelines on artificial intelligence for scholarship & teaching in language & literature? How?

  15. CFP from our MLA Committee on Information Technology for session at :

    “Evaluating Digital Scholarship Today: Problems and Solutions” bit.ly/mla2024CITcfp

    Proposal deadline 15 March 2023. Our committee is revising MLA’s Guidelines for evaluating digital scholarship. We could use input.

  16. Reminder: March 15 deadline for proposals for two panels at organized by MLA’s Committee on Information Technology. Here’s our CFP for sessions on evaluating digital scholarship and on AI ethics & practices in the academy: bit.ly/mla2024CITcfp. @MLAnews

  17. CFP from our MLA Committee on Information Technology for its session on “Ethics and Practice of AIs in the Academy”: bit.ly/mla2024CITcfp (deadline 15 March 2023) Should MLA in the future create guidelines on artificial intelligence for scholarship & teaching in language & literature? How?

  18. @benmschmidt @sramsay @jacobeisenstein @maria_antoniak @TedUnderwood @tisjune: #CriticalInfrastructureStudies, which I’ve been working on branding, is an interesting case because of the problem space opened up between humanistic “critique” and the area of research related to “mission critical” or other critical infrastructure.

  19. @benmschmidt @sramsay @jacobeisenstein @maria_antoniak @TedUnderwood @tisjune: , which I’ve been working on branding, is an interesting case because of the problem space opened up between humanistic “critique” and the area of research related to “mission critical” or other critical infrastructure.

  20. @benmschmidt @sramsay @jacobeisenstein @maria_antoniak @TedUnderwood @tisjune: #CriticalInfrastructureStudies, which I’ve been working on branding, is an interesting case because of the problem space opened up between humanistic “critique” and the area of research related to “mission critical” or other critical infrastructure.

  21. @benmschmidt @sramsay @jacobeisenstein @maria_antoniak @TedUnderwood @tisjune: #CriticalInfrastructureStudies, which I’ve been working on branding, is an interesting case because of the problem space opened up between humanistic “critique” and the area of research related to “mission critical” or other critical infrastructure.

  22. @benmschmidt @sramsay @jacobeisenstein @maria_antoniak @TedUnderwood @tisjune: #CriticalInfrastructureStudies, which I’ve been working on branding, is an interesting case because of the problem space opened up between humanistic “critique” and the area of research related to “mission critical” or other critical infrastructure.

  23. I'll be talking about the WE1S (WhatEvery1Says) project i(data-mining U.S. media on the humanities, we1s.ucsb.edu/) on 12 Nov. 2022 at the U.S. National Humanities Conference (nhalliance.org/2022_national_h) in session on "The Public, the Humanities, & the Public Humanities" (web.cvent.com/event/c010ad1b-4).

    I've been doing + in the fabled 25th hr. of each day forever. Coders spend their 25th hr. on open -source projects. My magical hour is for public humanities.